G Goose Senior Member Apr 24, 2002 #21 mmmm...but they look quite all right to me. Or is it becoz u edit already in PS?? What is the original size of the pics??
mmmm...but they look quite all right to me. Or is it becoz u edit already in PS?? What is the original size of the pics??
M munfai Senior Member Apr 24, 2002 #22 yah, i edited in PS already. needed to adjust the colour, and unsharp it as well. image size is 3072x2048 pixels. about 1.3 Mb each.
yah, i edited in PS already. needed to adjust the colour, and unsharp it as well. image size is 3072x2048 pixels. about 1.3 Mb each.
C ckiang Senior Member Apr 24, 2002 #23 Originally posted by munfai yah, i edited in PS already. needed to adjust the colour, and unsharp it as well. image size is 3072x2048 pixels. about 1.3 Mb each. Click to expand... These are from Photo Friend or Colour Lab? Photo Friend offers TIFF as an option, at no additional cost. But they do have a problem with slides having too much contrast. Regards CK
Originally posted by munfai yah, i edited in PS already. needed to adjust the colour, and unsharp it as well. image size is 3072x2048 pixels. about 1.3 Mb each. Click to expand... These are from Photo Friend or Colour Lab? Photo Friend offers TIFF as an option, at no additional cost. But they do have a problem with slides having too much contrast. Regards CK
M munfai Senior Member Apr 24, 2002 #24 colour lab. how much more contrast is more contrast? the scans i have are sorely lacking in contrast, but i don't want so much contrast till they're washed out
colour lab. how much more contrast is more contrast? the scans i have are sorely lacking in contrast, but i don't want so much contrast till they're washed out
S sunyee Guest May 12, 2002 #25 not adviceable to do a neg to CD compare to photo to CD which is much cheaper and faster + confirm better then neg to CD hehe
not adviceable to do a neg to CD compare to photo to CD which is much cheaper and faster + confirm better then neg to CD hehe
