SyncGuy
New Member
Let's be fair.. Never know when he'll need a DSLR for specific usage.
Philip, come, 1-to-1 trade with my red K30.. It don't mind resting in your dry cabi..
My K3 Experience
- Thread starter poseur
- Start date
Let's be fair.. Never know when he'll need a DSLR for specific usage.
Philip, come, 1-to-1 trade with my red K30.. It don't mind resting in your dry cabi..
felixcat8888
Senior Member
Let's be fair.. Never know when he'll need a DSLR for specific usage.
Philip, come, 1-to-1 trade with my red K30.. It don't mind resting in your dry cabi..
Limited Edition K30 Crystal Red version kekeke
PhilipKr35
Senior Member
Let's be fair.. Never know when he'll need a DSLR for specific usage.
Philip, come, 1-to-1 trade with my red K30.. It don't mind resting in your dry cabi..
My K3 waiting for FA31 to join together , still thinking,..maybe the 16-85 WR ?...
PhilipKr35
Senior Member
Would definitely join outing wherever possible, missed two already due to work. Nov n Dec more likely can .
This week was the first that I pulled the SD card outta the K-3 and popped it into LR. I'm finding the images soft and high ISO stuff noisy. I don't reckon it's the lens but am hard pressed to figure out what is wrong...
I have read something about ISO being worser than the K-5 series bodies but some of the stuff at ISO6400 looks terrible... Do I turn NR off and PP the RAW files? Is there any other way?
I have read something about ISO being worser than the K-5 series bodies but some of the stuff at ISO6400 looks terrible... Do I turn NR off and PP the RAW files? Is there any other way?
SyncGuy
New Member
Most importantly, are you planning to print out the said images?
Some of it has to have print potential as they were for my office outing.
SyncGuy
New Member
Ah... I see... Maybe try convert it to b&w then.. Or just don't print those images at A4 size.. Standard 4R can liao..
Remember, photographers usually look at pixels whereas viewers always look at the picture.
Could you post a pic or two for us to see?
Remember, photographers usually look at pixels whereas viewers always look at the picture.
Wow. Very enlightening. Now I must stop looking at only the pretty girls in those group photos.....
SyncGuy
New Member
Wow. Very enlightening. Now I must stop looking at only the pretty girls in those group photos.....
Haha! Look at the girls but don't look at their pores.
PS: Poseur, you're so good with portraiture, why don't you go for the 645 format?
Last edited:
Firstly, are you sure your shots are in focus?
Next, K3 pixel density is not K5 pixel density, basically, you are 'zooming' in more that on a 16mp file, so when ppl make that statement that K3 100% worse than K5, of course it is, different level of 'zoom in'.
The K3 file downsampled to the size of the K5 file will have an advantage over the latter.
RAW is also what it is, RAW, so you will need to set the appropriate settings (usually sharpening and NR, as well as exposure and contrast (light/dark levels) )
I am not sure what you are getting, so could be user expectation, user error, etc.
Better to post some photos.
felixcat8888
Senior Member
Haha! Look at the girls but don't look at their pores.
PS: Poseur, you're so good with portraiture, why don't you go for the 645 format?
He has gone to the DARK side kekeke
SyncGuy
New Member
Yea.. I know but brands don't matter anymore whenever I recommend anything camera.. I'll give recommendations according to individual's needs and capabilities.
More often than not, it's Fuji all the way.. Simply because most won't do RAW and Fuji SOOC is awesome.
Another thing, their flash balance for a total idiot is sublime...
So yea..
Haha! Look at the girls but don't look at their pores.
PS: Poseur, you're so good with portraiture, why don't you go for the 645 format?
Have tried MF before n its really good. But I can't afford the many zeros to pay for it.
Ya....I need to buy more strobe. Turn dark side to bright bright side.
Yea.. I know but brands don't matter anymore whenever I recommend anything camera.. I'll give recommendations according to individual's needs and capabilities.
More often than not, it's Fuji all the way.. Simply because most won't do RAW and Fuji SOOC is awesome.
Another thing, their flash balance for a total idiot is sublime...
So yea..
(Whisper)Psst....erh...Po....NY.....oops...pls don't ban me....
SyncGuy
New Member
Eeee-yur!
Try blast off the flash in the face. Bam!
Deer-in-headlight look.. LoL!
Most users won't care much about taking the effort for proper lighting setup but always wish that it wouldn't look like it.. So far, only one brand can do it..
Most users won't care much about taking the effort for proper lighting setup but always wish that it wouldn't look like it.. So far, only one brand can do it..
What brand??? I curious ...
Similar threads
