More Nikon users now??
- Thread starter gremlin
- Start date
- Status
Need to find inspiration... Very sad coz I just lost my 3 years worth of pictures due to HDD crash :cry:This should give you an indication of the D70 take up rate recently: http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=124201
OMG said:
You sound so darm pro but still not a single post of your photo. We all still waiting for your masterpiece or your work so that we can learn from you.
I had being using Canon for more than 40 years and had spend over 50K on it and yet disagree with you.
We as Canon users got a meeting talking about you and are so ashamed that you say such childish , immature comments
:thumbsd: :thumbsd: :thumbsd:
Wai said:because Canon users are so busy shooting and posting in PHOTO GALLERIES sub-forums, they hardly have time to post in EQUIPMENT DISCUSSIONS or form usergroup to gather and chit-chat every week??
never see you post pictures before :sticktong :bsmilie: :bsmilie: :bsmilie:
erm, i a relative newbie to CS, but i believe the fact that there are more nikon posts than canon posts is indisputable proof that fujifilm DSLR cameras emit harmful radiation which adversely affects the sex-drives of its users. hence fujifilm DSLR users spend less time engaging in social activities with the opposite sex and procreating. they use the extra time they have at home on the computer posting on the forums. since fujifilm DSLRs use nikon-mount lenses, they inevitably contribute to and account for the fact that there are more nikon than canon posts.
my point is, don't you guys think that a lot of irrelevant conclusions are being drawn from the fact that there are slightly more nikon posts than canon posts? how does the number of posts indicate, for example, that:
1) nikon users are not as good photography-wise as canon users.
2) canon products are more reliable than nikon products.
the only safe conclusion that can be drawn is that, since the start of CS, there are more posts in the nikon thread than in the canon thread. period.
my point is, don't you guys think that a lot of irrelevant conclusions are being drawn from the fact that there are slightly more nikon posts than canon posts? how does the number of posts indicate, for example, that:
1) nikon users are not as good photography-wise as canon users.
2) canon products are more reliable than nikon products.
the only safe conclusion that can be drawn is that, since the start of CS, there are more posts in the nikon thread than in the canon thread. period.
obviousdude
Senior Member
whahahatimlim said:
good one. :thumbsup:
V
vince123123
Guest
Happened to chance upon this thread.
Espn, so you're saying that all these are the same person? Or that they simply belong in the same category of trolls?
Just curious
Espn, so you're saying that all these are the same person? Or that they simply belong in the same category of trolls?
Just curiousespn said:
V
vince123123
Guest
yeap I just saw it and posted an appropriate response.
I did not recall cash/minoxman being a leica snob or darkroom snob before though that's why I asked. Perhaps I was mistaken. These alt nicks and new comebacks always confuses me hehe
I did not recall cash/minoxman being a leica snob or darkroom snob before though that's why I asked. Perhaps I was mistaken. These alt nicks and new comebacks always confuses me hehe
espn said:
But they're always the same, once you see somebody out to antagonize others and once they lose in a 'battle' they will throw challenges to get you off the track and get personal also.
Leica snob I believe is another person totally, but you/I will never know. Because from what I know the original person behind this nick isn't just an ordinary person... supposedly to be rich.
And for a leica snob to NOT be able to afford a credit card is very suspicious... especially since leica snob owns an M6.
Leica snob I believe is another person totally, but you/I will never know.
Because from what I know the original person behind this nick isn't just an ordinary person... supposedly to be rich.And for a leica snob to NOT be able to afford a credit card is very suspicious... especially since leica snob owns an M6.
V
vince123123
Guest
where's the part about the credit card?
espn said:But they're always the same, once you see somebody out to antagonize others and once they lose in a 'battle' they will throw challenges to get you off the track and get personal also.
Leica snob I believe is another person totally, but you/I will never know.
And for a leica snob to NOT be able to afford a credit card is very suspicious... especially since leica snob owns an M6.
- Status
Similar threads
