Originally posted by Jed
Hi CK,
Personally, I think Daniel's shots are better. One reason: background. Sometimes, nearer is not always better. Because you were up close and using a wide angle lens, there's lots of messy background in your shots. Whereas with Daniel's shots he has little except the relevant event information, which is also well decorated/lit and adds to the flavour of his pictures. Concentrate on everything in the shot next time!
Otherwise, some nice shots as well, background aside!