Originally posted by munfai
it certainly will help us to spend more!!!
Originally posted by nhyone
Just curious, where did you get this chart? The units are non-metric. AFAIK, the local catalogues should be using metric units.
Originally posted by ninelives
erm /me scratches head. what do u mean??
ya lor, this one is a G lens mah. wat about AF20-35 ? have u check out the price?Originally posted by TME
BTW, for interested brothers here, I asked CP for a quotation for the Minolta 17-35mm f/3.5 G.........guess what ...............it's $2500!!!!!!! Got a real shock. Never expected it to be so expensive. Have got to consider similar 3rd party lens from Sigma, Cosina and Tokina already manz...........
I got a shock when I asked for the 300/2.8 lens.Originally posted by TME
BTW, for interested brothers here, I asked CP for a quotation for the Minolta 17-35mm f/3.5 G.........guess what ...............it's $2500!!!!!!! Got a real shock. Never expected it to be so expensive.
Originally posted by ninelives
ya lor, this one is a G lens mah. wat about AF20-35 ? have u check out the price?
Originally posted by nhyone
I got a shock when I asked for the 300/2.8 lens.![]()
I totally forgot about this thread until it resurfaced!Originally posted by TME
What's the price like?
But most consumer-class zoom lenses that go to 300mm are usually not very good at 300mm. This is only what I read, no practical experience.Anyway, that is a pro lens for me lah. Rather buy a zoom, more versatile and also I not good enough to spot any real differences in optical quality loh!
Originally posted by nhyone
I totally forgot about this thread until it resurfaced!Try Cathay Photo's eQuote..
But most consumer-class zoom lenses that go to 300mm are usually not very good at 300mm. This is only what I read, no practical experience.
And I believe the difference should be obvious, especially at wide apertures. Not just this lens; I believe you get what you pay for.
Do you mean there's an optimal focal length/aperture for every lens? Sure, but if the optimal point is 135mm @ f/8, it sure won't help you if you want to shoot at 300mm @ f/5.6.Originally posted by TME
But there is always a sweet spot loh for most lens range. That is where brands like Tamron, Tokina, Cosina, Vivitar and Sigma come in.
No choice. Even a 300/4 lens is very expensive already, and it is "only" one stop faster than a 100-300/4.5-5.6 zoom lens. But what you get is not just that one stop. When you get such a lens, presumably it's to use f/4 most of the time, so it has to be good there. This is unlike consumer-class lenses, where you often have to stop down to get good result.The 3 big brands are really way off the scale for large aperture lens.
Originally posted by sulhan
Hiee.....
Juz to share...for the Sigma 70-300mm f4-5.6 APO macro Super......surprisingy the shop directly opposite Mcdonalds in Lucky plaza (door entrance is angled to the walay outside).....i think its selling for minolta mount 330SGD.....Fotoguide i think is 380sgd.....
regards,
me