[MGohzxc] Scapes @ 11


Status
Not open for further replies.
actually that just looks like she burnt the highlights after they had been blown. :)

..Yeah Wk.. Could be.. think i seeing things .. :)

Hello bro. NNB, thanks but I still dont really understand 100%. Btw, I shot at f16 45sec. exposure without any filters and there was slight haze I think.. maybe is also the pp.

Manita, its ok.. think too much haze in recent weeks ard, plus the light pollution in SG is quite bad :)
 

actually that just looks like she burnt the highlights after they had been blown. :)
Hello uncle night86mare, thanks and your eyes is very sharp. yes I burnt most of the lamp post but not the lights on the building.. next time, i will be more careful. thanks again...:embrass:
 

..Yeah Wk.. Could be.. think i seeing things .. :)



Manita, its ok.. think too much haze in recent weeks ard, plus the light pollution in SG is quite bad :)
Hello bro. NNB, thanks again. maybe next time when we meet, you can explain to me again.
Hope to see you soon in the next outing...:)
 

#117
5261903669_4db593de5a_b_d.jpg
 

f16 actually is very close to triggering the diffraction. f8-f12 maybe the safer range.

Actually for current APS-C cameras, diffraction starts to kick in only around F18. F16 is smallest we can go for APS-C.
 

Very very impressive catch. The exposure is just right as it brings out the mood of the timing. The darker tone gives a mysterious feel which makes the picture even more interesting to take a second and longer look.

 

Very very impressive catch. The exposure is just right as it brings out the mood of the timing. The darker tone gives a mysterious feel which makes the picture even more interesting to take a second and longer look.
Hello Oracle0711, thanks for the C&C and also glad that you like it. Will try to improve more.:)
 

This is nice. I like how you selected 2 different kinds of processing in 2 different parts of the photo. :thumbsup:
Hello uncle Albert, thanks. it took quite awhile for me to do it.:)
 


Good capture of clouds! Pity though because at a glance the boats make the foreground somewhat look 'soft', when it isn't.


I like the smooth-silky water. It's just my observation but I think this would be better if you could move forward more to compose the rocks at the far end as it is more 'dispersed' and will make it less cluttered. I see some nice rocks out there :)
But then again I guess it is not safe for you to go any further and it is quite challenging to get a good placement and angle to firmly plant your tripod.

Keep shooting! :thumbsup:
 

Good capture of clouds! Pity though because at a glance the boats make the foreground somewhat look 'soft', when it isn't.



I like the smooth-silky water. It's just my observation but I think this would be better if you could move forward more to compose the rocks at the far end as it is more 'dispersed' and will make it less cluttered. I see some nice rocks out there :)
But then again I guess it is not safe for you to go any further and it is quite challenging to get a good placement and angle to firmly plant your tripod.

Keep shooting! :thumbsup:

Hi Zul, thanks for your C&C. yes doing the LE and then the boat move. So disappointed.:(
For #120, I agree with you that i should move forward and is cluttered. Actually is also ok to get into the water a little. Is quite safe. I will go back again to reshoot. Is near to my house. thanks so much...:)
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top