blackmusic said:why do so many MF user still prefer to use MF lens on even DSLR?
AF wld be better.
:what:
blackmusic said:why do so many MF user still prefer to use MF lens on even DSLR?
AF wld be better.
:what:
patch17 said:what's so hard about turning a little ring around a lens? :dunno:
MF gives you a statisfaction that AF cannot.blackmusic said:why do so many MF user still prefer to use MF lens on even DSLR?
AF wld be better.
:what:
an ultra-sharp can be blurred in ps, blurred cant become ultra-sharp.The_Cheat said:I believe that people who felt AF that is king, have never taken a whole series of purposely blurred pictures before. Try doing that sometimes, and it will give you a different kind of perspective of what blurred photographs could actually achieve, when the ultra-sharp photos can't.
I think this is a more valid reason. :thumbsup:idor said:AF would offer convenience..... but then MF have f1.2 lens.... Better is relative.... it your preference that ultimately decides what you use....
:thumbsup:singscott said:My view is AF is a tool, it is just there for you to use it
blackmusic said:why do so many MF user still prefer to use MF lens on even DSLR?