Not if you price your second hand goods reasonably, other than bags I still manage to sell off my stuff easily enough.![]()
Exactly, if not its just flooding the BNS forum for months with the same items and "No Lowballers" LOL
Not if you price your second hand goods reasonably, other than bags I still manage to sell off my stuff easily enough.![]()
Exactly, if not its just flooding the BNS forum for months with the same items and "No Lowballers" LOL
One of the problems, I reckon, is Sellers Do NOT take into account Current Retail
Price but base their Asking price on their own Purchase Price few years ago.
A glaring example is Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 mk2 which was being sold at about
$ 3200 just 2years ago. Many Sellers for this Lens asking for $ 2,200 and make a
Big Deal that they are losing $ 1,000 in just 2 years usage.
But Brand New Lens today after Canon Cash Back is Only at $ 2,300
So a prospective Buyer offering $ 1700-$ 1800 is then Branded a Lowballer
Is this fair ?
u think the average price is hovering at around $1.85-1.9k.
...And if a consistent seller like myself, who has made significant amount of sales on CS B&S (which can be easily checked), but never have had any negative feedback, always list my full number without any intentions to disguise it (for whatever reason, I don't know, you can easily find the numbers if you just search random parts of it anyways)... Thereby indicating that buying a second-hand item from me would be relatively risk-free... Does your whole write-up still apply? I would like to think not.
This state of anarchy and lawlessness needs to be remedied with Buyer
Seller protocols on Forum Etiquette and Pricing. It's time we preserved
The integrity of the Marketplace for our mutual benefit.
Think if current dilemma with Lowballing Buyers and Highballing Sellers can be minimised or better
Still, completely eradicated, then the whole Marketplace Experience on ClubSnap will be enhanced.
Just to kickstart and brainstorm possible alternatives, if All Seller Posts are , in the first instance,
Scrutinised by a moderating panel to align the advertisement and prices to be in conformity with
some checklist criteria, then ClubSnap would already have gone a long way to resolution.
Even if it means a 24-48 hour delay before Sell Requests are finally Listed on Forum pages, it is a
Small inconvenience to eliminate lowballers and highballers.
Needless to say, prices in scrutinised and moderated Sell Advertisements are Fixed and Final and
No bargaining of any kind will be tolerated. Only exception be where parties agree to deal without all
The peripheral items in the Post and then a corresponding discount maybe considered.
Sellers have an obligation to Report all concluded Sales so to provide the Moderating Panel with a
History of transactional data to facilitate their scrutineering works downstream.
The legalese can be easily spelt out but there must be agreement first on how best to achieve the
objectives of providing a very transparent and fuss-free marketplace free from price manipulation.
A token fee can be levied for each Post so that many who persistently default the 3-day repeat Ad
Rule can be more circumspect and Posts in Forums not flooded by blatant repeats.
Ultimately it's about self-governance , if we as a community do not take steps to regulate our
affairs, then why should anyone else bother ?
It's a crying shame when Sellers have to remark in their Posts : Please Do Not Lowball !!
it will be a part time job at least, and he will be the most dislike person in ClubSNAP.Would you take up the job to monitor the feedbacks and moderate selelrs' expectation - an onerous task?
CASE may get on you if you regulate the price...
Free market - low ball or high ball let it be. Why fuzz over such matters..........
Think if current dilemma with Lowballing Buyers and Highballing Sellers can be minimised or better
Still, completely eradicated, then the whole Marketplace Experience on ClubSnap will be enhanced.
Just to kickstart and brainstorm possible alternatives, if All Seller Posts are , in the first instance,
Scrutinised by a moderating panel to align the advertisement and prices to be in conformity with
some checklist criteria, then ClubSnap would already have gone a long way to resolution.
Even if it means a 24-48 hour delay before Sell Requests are finally Listed on Forum pages, it is a
Small inconvenience to eliminate lowballers and highballers.
Needless to say, prices in scrutinised and moderated Sell Advertisements are Fixed and Final and
No bargaining of any kind will be tolerated. Only exception be where parties agree to deal without all
The peripheral items in the Post and then a corresponding discount maybe considered.
Sellers have an obligation to Report all concluded Sales so to provide the Moderating Panel with a
History of transactional data to facilitate their scrutineering works downstream.
The legalese can be easily spelt out but there must be agreement first on how best to achieve the
objectives of providing a very transparent and fuss-free marketplace free from price manipulation.
A token fee can be levied for each Post so that many who persistently default the 3-day repeat Ad
Rule can be more circumspect and Posts in Forums not flooded by blatant repeats.
Ultimately it's about self-governance , if we as a community do not take steps to regulate our
affairs, then why should anyone else bother ?
It's a crying shame when Sellers have to remark in their Posts : Please Do Not Lowball !!
Especially if the payment for this person is coming from fee that are suggested 😄it will be a part time job at least, and he will be the most dislike person in ClubSNAP.![]()
For all the alarmist talk predicting the downfall of Clubsnap (and maybe London Bridge falling) because of a unregulated BnS, I think theres more to this forum than BnS.
If people choose not to trade via Clubsnap as the platform, so be it. Life would go on. People would probably still come here to share pictures, experience or learn more about what camera to buy.
Reminds me on the 'official' high balling system in property market: CoV.In the end, the fundamental issue also not solved. Who are we to tell others what they can sell their property at? How can we force on others what we think is fair, when it is their property not ours?
Reminds me on the 'official' high balling system in property market: CoV.
Some property agent rated the property and set the price but in the end the price was higher. And it was legally clean.