Lovely Elaine


Status
Not open for further replies.
Nice. Since everyone posting original unprocessed, I'll join in too (I hate doing processing)
First, a telephoto shot

A-004.jpg


Now, a wide angle

A-076.jpg


Tks for viewing
 

the pics would been better if at least the scars and marks were cleaned up
 

wow, u all damn damn fast!
i just wake up and saw sooo many photos!
all photos of elaine is very nice!
i wan to contribue too, but is all from digital camer LOL

btw really sorry for wat had happen ytd :(
 

and to jaykay
those extra 2 photographers are shooting bcos they are waiting for their model to come
they left your group once e model is there. but i apologise for it.
anyway theres 16photographers there ytd, 2 suddenly MIA on tat day.
 

Power of L lens... even without DI.... :thumbsup:
 

i like this:)
Thanks

the pics would been better if at least the scars and marks were cleaned up
Agreed.

and to jaykay
those extra 2 photographers are shooting bcos they are waiting for their model to come
they left your group once e model is there. but i apologise for it.
anyway theres 16photographers there ytd, 2 suddenly MIA on tat day.
Apology accepted. I only returned to group shoots recently after a long layoff and I certainly hope this has not become the norm for shoots organised in CS.
 

Power of L lens... even without DI.... :thumbsup:

Certain level of PS still has to be done to clean up the photo... I did too, but in a quick way.

I do agree that a telephoto prime will help to diffuse the background for nice portraits. But there are some sacrifices... as it's very, very tough to take full body portraits using that 135mm. I'll need a 2nd body or swap lenses to use 50mm prime for pictures that includes the surrounding.

Apology accepted. I only returned to group shoots recently after a long layoff and I certainly hope this has not become the norm for shoots organised in CS.

Bro, are you the guy with the large ring flash? ;)

should we be doing something bout the dark underarms in photoshop?:D

Not exactly dark, but I do agree that something should be done to cover it up... or don't post? :bsmilie:
 

Last edited:
Thanks

Agreed.

Apology accepted. I only returned to group shoots recently after a long layoff and I certainly hope this has not become the norm for shoots organised in CS.

this is definitely not a norm in CS. the organiser just didnt notice . an organiser has many responsibilty and area to look out for during a shoot, so pardon for the small mishap.
because some photographers will tend to be attracted by the other models, grass is always greener on the other side.hahaha.

between very nice sharp,clear pictures. love the bokeh. what lens did u use?

only thing to pick on would be the green patch above elaine right eyes on the forehead in #1
 

between very nice sharp,clear pictures. love the bokeh. what lens did u use?

only thing to pick on would be the green patch above elaine right eyes on the forehead in #1

Hmm which photo are you referring to? There are a few #1s. :bsmilie:
 

wah... see u all both fast hand fast leg mi too fast hand fast leg pick 3 pics to bump up
cheerz

(1)
3141412238_29076d27ea.jpg


THIS. got right.
what lens are u using? share share. haha
 

this is definitely not a norm in CS. the organiser just didnt notice . an organiser has many responsibilty and area to look out for during a shoot, so pardon for the small mishap.
because some photographers will tend to be attracted by the other models, grass is always greener on the other side.hahaha...
With due apologies to the TS, may I ask if you are his partner and present at the shoot? The incident I was referring to happened in front of the assembly area and Justin was there. I even asked loudly how come there are more than six photographers shooting.
With apolgies from the organiser, I was actually content to let the matter rest after expressing the hope that this does not become de riguor for future shoots.
However, since you as a shoot organiser has chosen to respond so flippantly about it, it leads one to the conclusion that whilst you as a shoot organiser, and perhaps others too, charge a fee for participation, you do not realise that for having received due consideration, it is your legal obligation to ensure that participants do not encounter undue interference towards the enjoyment of the promised service. Yes, it is legally binding even for a deal struck through this forum.
Any diligent organiser would have planned to prevent such known tendencies (as you describe it) from jeopardising the group shoot. I participated in 2 group shoots with Charby, involving 8 models in one and 7 models in the other. He only brought 1 assistant but no such incident occurred. It is a matter of how conscientous the organiser is and his professional attitude towards providing the service.
Of course, the participant's co-operation helps a great deal. If you wish to debate this further, let's take it to kopi-tiam so as not to OT this thread further.
 

All the pics are not bad. :lovegrin:
 

wah... see u all both fast hand fast leg mi too fast hand fast leg pick 3 pics to bump up
cheerz

(1)
3141412238_29076d27ea.jpg


THIS. got right.
what lens are u using? share share. haha


THIS. got right.????
dont understand... lol

and using a 50mm 1.8 with a d80 body.
off day tomolo.will go thr the pics hope to be able to up a thread tomolo for c&c.
 

THIS. got right.????
dont understand... lol

and using a 50mm 1.8 with a d80 body.
off day tomolo.will go thr the pics hope to be able to up a thread tomolo for c&c.

IloveBeaches was referring to this slight green tinting on Elaine's right eye. There's really abit if you look closely (if still cannot see, you may want to calibrate your monitor or look from another PC). It's not a big problem, but that spot does attract some unwanted attention.

Maybe your next thread should include Miyake also? :D
 

IloveBeaches was referring to this slight green tinting on Elaine's right eye. There's really abit if you look closely (if still cannot see, you may want to calibrate your monitor or look from another PC). It's not a big problem, but that spot does attract some unwanted attention.

Maybe your next thread should include Miyake also? :D

ya thanks for explaining for me. anyway small thing only. nice series over all.

With due apologies to the TS, may I ask if you are his partner and present at the shoot? The incident I was referring to happened in front of the assembly area and Justin was there. I even asked loudly how come there are more than six photographers shooting.
With apolgies from the organiser, I was actually content to let the matter rest after expressing the hope that this does not become de riguor for future shoots.
However, since you as a shoot organiser has chosen to respond so flippantly about it, it leads one to the conclusion that whilst you as a shoot organiser, and perhaps others too, charge a fee for participation, you do not realise that for having received due consideration, it is your legal obligation to ensure that participants do not encounter undue interference towards the enjoyment of the promised service. Yes, it is legally binding even for a deal struck through this forum.
Any diligent organiser would have planned to prevent such known tendencies (as you describe it) from jeopardising the group shoot. I participated in 2 group shoots with Charby, involving 8 models in one and 7 models in the other. He only brought 1 assistant but no such incident occurred. It is a matter of how conscientous the organiser is and his professional attitude towards providing the service.
Of course, the participant's co-operation helps a great deal. If you wish to debate this further, let's take it to kopi-tiam so as not to OT this thread further.

i believe u misunderstand me, have pm u to explain. =)
customer has always been the top priority to me, if not i wouldnt even bother to send a survey form to all my photographers and attached a 5 dollar voucher to it.
that is actually alot of work and alot of money.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top