First pt is I meant when chasing the subj that's out of frame..
If you are doing it right, your subject should be in frame before you half press your shutter button (thereby activating AF and VR) and stay in frame till you fired off the shot. So, how can VR affect AF when the subject is out of frame? There are no AF points outside the frame last I remember.
And btw, chasing after subjects that is out of frame is one of the worse things you can do... If your eye is stuck to the viewfinder, and the subject is out of frame, how can you chase it properly? People die that way you know... eye stuck to the viewfinder, start chasing and move around... fall down a cliff or a ditch... And it is not a joke, it has happened before.
Second n third.. the afc is driven by motor in the lens right? So If No motor... the lens effectively can't do the af tracking? What I See on the ranting is the af is comparatively slower than the Nikon lens.. so the af is sub par..
AF-C = continuous AF. It is driven by what ever is driving the AF in that lens. So if the lens is a AFS lens, it means the motor is built into the lens. No matter which camera body you use, it is the same motor driving the lens. So that presence of a AF motor in the cam body has no correlation whatsoever. And for lenses with AFS, it does not necessarily mean the AF motor is inferiror. Some AF motors in AFS lenses are simply superb. for example the AFS 800/5.6 VR, or even the 70-200VR2. You really do get what you pay for. With the much higher prices you are not just paying for the larger aperture or the image quality, you are also paying for superior AF and/or in other areas (like build). That is why some people will rather pay so much more to go for more expensive pro grade lenses.
And on the other hand, some AFS lenses are know to have focusing speeds that are less impressive. An example is the AFS 50/1.4G. An older AF 50/1.4D on a fast camera like the D3s will outfocus the 50/1.4G any day. So maybe that is what you have been reading but misunderstood. But if the lenses in question are AFS (or 3rd party equivalent), the focusing speed is still mostly dependent of the motor in the lens itself.
Nice pic.. care to explain the technique involved?
Single spot AF with AF-C with VR on, panning and in the rain. So the subject is moving, and I am moving as well. VR worked fine, AF worked fine. In this situation the VR is useful because it removes any possible shake in the up-down axis. VRs nowadays are smart enough to know when you are panning...
I guess If I can't share anyth based on my own findings.. there No way to know I have been wrong... so What u r suggesting seems to n just one-sided learning.. people make mistakes..
Sure you can share. But when you know so little on what is going on, it is better to actually learn more about the craft and techniques first. At least have a good foundation of the basics first which I see you lack from your posts and advice in so many threads. And it is a good thing to be a little more humble when your mistakes are pointed out. And they will get called out sometimes, especially when some of us need to step in to make sure readers are not learning the wrong things. Don't feel offended and take it as a learning opportunity. No one started out knowing everything.
Don't get me wrong, discussion is a good thing. But giving advice to others (with conviction, may I add) when your own understanding is lacking is not the best thing to do.
And one more thing... think things through first before assuming, or typing. Many of what you wrote are common sense errors. So it might be prudent to also re-read and understand what you say or write a few more times before hitting "Post". An example of which is in the first point of this post (see above).