The wise ones always say it's never about the equipment, but I think this is debatable, when it comes to sharpness and consistency. Recently on a trip to Iceland, I thought I managed to capture shots with a 12-24mm f/4 nikkor much sharper than the Sigma (comparing the 17-24mm focal lengths of course), on a D90. So I am thinking of finding a pro-grade lens that is a huge upgrade to the Sigma 17-70mm which I currently own.
I was reading about the Nikon 35-70mm f/2.8, but is this lens really much sharper than the Sigma?
Would I be better off with a 35mm prime?
Feel free to give your opinions on this thread.
I was reading about the Nikon 35-70mm f/2.8, but is this lens really much sharper than the Sigma?
Would I be better off with a 35mm prime?
Feel free to give your opinions on this thread.