Looking into getting a leica m, would like to get user experience from both versions. Many thanks in advance
You may want to compare the M6 and the MP.![]()
Leitz version is better built - smoother mechanically, with clearer VF.
OTOH, it's older, with a somewhat less sensitive meter.
laurie
MP is out of my league, considering M6 classic or M4.
I read the article before too Benny, it seems to be quite a problem. Have you confirmed? The earlier are made in Canada and later in Germany right?
haha. benny, 1.5kUSD or SGD? People are asking for $2300 for black wore-out ones here
I've heard as high as 2600 sold for black chrome ones here *puzzled*
I thought it was the later model that is better built. The earlier version was favored by collectors' looking for something cosmetically different. In fact, some of the Leica lenses could not be mounted properly on the earlier M6. The highly regarded Leica Summicron-M 50mm f/2.0 Dual Range is one of them.
Here's an interesting read.
http://www.cameraquest.com/m6dif.htm
Cheers,
I recently passed on 2 sets at S$1550 or equivalent on 2 separate occasion because it was the Wetzlar sets. Chrome too. I think the M6 TTL is more suited to my taste. Perhaps I should have bought it and flog it off here.
Cheers,
MP is out of my league, considering M6 classic or M4.
whats your budget bro?
suggesting that in the sense that differences are more discernible.
But the M6 is certainly a good choice, it was my first Leica M. I had the Leitz version and did not encounter any of the problems mentioned on this thread. There was light leakage (that I got fixed later) which had more to do with wear and tear than because it was a Leitz model.