Leica T with rangefinder lenses


nex100

Senior Member
Dumped my A7 and just got the Leica T. Liked the colors reproduced and the way blacks and shadows are being captured with lots of details. Details captured by the APSC sensor is amazing. I would say it is the same or better than the M9. Colors are almost the same CCD sensor of the M9. Touch screen is very convenient especially during image playback and when you want to zoom in or out of the image.

Image is clean at ISO 1600 and shutter is as quiet as can be compared to the A7. Good part about the shutter is that I can take photos handheld at 1/15s which is something that will not happen with the A7.

Focusing with the big screen is a breeze with M lenses so I don't think I will be needing the EVF but my thumb needs to press on the top part of the screen to get more stability. Maybe I will need a thumbs up adapter. Focus magnification is activated via the left custom dial. I use auto ISO and shoot at manual settings so the right dial controls shutter speed. Overall good and intuitive camera to use.

This is a camera that brings you back to basics with manual rangefinder lenses. Manual focusing, no noise reduction or any form of lens correction. Set maximum ISO and minimum shutter speed and you can just focus on taking photos. Although a lot of people say this is not a M replacement camera, I would say it is a very good camera that lets you use rangefinder lenses with maximum compatibility and resolution. Even the 15mm heliar is as sharp as it can be on the corners (and it won't work properly on M9 or M240 due to color shifts). Due to the APSC sensor, the widest you can go is with the 12mm CV lens (equals to 18mm).

My ZM 50mm Planar works better on the Leica T than on the A7 showing more details and less camera shake due to the shutter. But I have to live with the crop sensor. Well until I have enough money to buy the M240, this will have to do for now. I will say this will be a good M8 replacement for those who do not want to spend too much money on a camera body.
 

Is there any other Leica T users on this forum? I am wondering is there a way for manual lens to trigger the focus magnification via turning the lens' focusing ring instead of using a dial to trigger it.
 

Is there any other Leica T users on this forum? I am wondering is there a way for manual lens to trigger the focus magnification via turning the lens' focusing ring instead of using a dial to trigger it.
Hi, I've just got the T as well. Don't have many opportunities to use it. However, I find that ISO 3200 is a bit challenging. Yeah, focus magnification via turning will be good.
 

Firmware 1.3 is out now. I have just updated my T and it just got better.
 

i find it very easy to pair with T either with M or R lenses. But I would certainly need the Visoflex, it certainly helps a lot on MF. 2 pictures I took during a trip this year to Fujian during May.

50mm Summicron

180m R f4
 

Dumped my A7 and just got the Leica T. Liked the colors reproduced and the way blacks and shadows are being captured with lots of details. Details captured by the APSC sensor is amazing. I would say it is the same or better than the M9. Colors are almost the same CCD sensor of the M9. Touch screen is very convenient especially during image playback and when you want to zoom in or out of the image.

Image is clean at ISO 1600 and shutter is as quiet as can be compared to the A7. Good part about the shutter is that I can take photos handheld at 1/15s which is something that will not happen with the A7.

Focusing with the big screen is a breeze with M lenses so I don't think I will be needing the EVF but my thumb needs to press on the top part of the screen to get more stability. Maybe I will need a thumbs up adapter. Focus magnification is activated via the left custom dial. I use auto ISO and shoot at manual settings so the right dial controls shutter speed. Overall good and intuitive camera to use.

This is a camera that brings you back to basics with manual rangefinder lenses. Manual focusing, no noise reduction or any form of lens correction. Set maximum ISO and minimum shutter speed and you can just focus on taking photos. Although a lot of people say this is not a M replacement camera, I would say it is a very good camera that lets you use rangefinder lenses with maximum compatibility and resolution. Even the 15mm heliar is as sharp as it can be on the corners (and it won't work properly on M9 or M240 due to color shifts). Due to the APSC sensor, the widest you can go is with the 12mm CV lens (equals to 18mm).

My ZM 50mm Planar works better on the Leica T than on the A7 showing more details and less camera shake due to the shutter. But I have to live with the crop sensor. Well until I have enough money to buy the M240, this will have to do for now. I will say this will be a good M8 replacement for those who do not want to spend too much money on a camera body.

----------------

Dumped my Leica M9 and Leica T and just got a SONY A7.
I had enough with the Leica-sensor-disaster. (sensor-Lebra)

I use the Leica lens on the Sony A7 and the result is great.

Waiting for the Sony A7II with IBIS -
this is the future....!

btw: very strange, how can you compare APS-C Sensor with the Sony FF-Sensor?!
 

Bro I agree that APSC cannot compare to Full Frame sensor. But there is a problem with full frame camera here.

I have adapted rangefinder lens from Sony Nex7 to Fuji Ex-1 to Sony A7 and there is 1 frustration - there is no way to get corner to corner sharp images which is a big deal to me because I like to take a lot of architecture and landscape images. With the Sony A7s, wide angle lenses are usable and better than A7r and A7 but you still do not get corner to corner sharpness.

For the Leica T, I get corner to corner sharpness. No problem with almost all the rangefinder lens I am using. Even with the CV 15mm Heliar (does not work well on M9), I have no problem using it. True, I get a cropped view so that is the compromise I have to make.

Secondly with the Leica T, I can take images at 1/15 shutter speeds. Try doing that with the A7 and you find that it is very difficult without a tripod. Something to do with the weight of the camera. I can do the same on the M9 but the image is not clean at ISO 1250 and I get clean images with the T at ISO 1600 and if I work on the image in Lightroom, ISO 6400 works as well.

I prefer a full frame sensor but none of the them works for me. Until I can afford the M240, I will have to live with the APSC sensor of the T.
 

Does anyone know where I can buy a thumbie in Singapore?
 

Bro I agree that APSC cannot compare to Full Frame sensor. But there is a problem with full frame camera here.

I have adapted rangefinder lens from Sony Nex7 to Fuji Ex-1 to Sony A7 and there is 1 frustration - there is no way to get corner to corner sharp images which is a big deal to me because I like to take a lot of architecture and landscape images. With the Sony A7s, wide angle lenses are usable and better than A7r and A7 but you still do not get corner to corner sharpness.

For the Leica T, I get corner to corner sharpness. No problem with almost all the rangefinder lens I am using. Even with the CV 15mm Heliar (does not work well on M9), I have no problem using it. True, I get a cropped view so that is the compromise I have to make.

Secondly with the Leica T, I can take images at 1/15 shutter speeds. Try doing that with the A7 and you find that it is very difficult without a tripod. Something to do with the weight of the camera. I can do the same on the M9 but the image is not clean at ISO 1250 and I get clean images with the T at ISO 1600 and if I work on the image in Lightroom, ISO 6400 works as well.

I prefer a full frame sensor but none of the them works for me. Until I can afford the M240, I will have to live with the APSC sensor of the T.

Have you tried the Ricoh GXR? The experience of using it with M mount lenses beats the Leica T. The downside is that the ISO performance is not as good.
 

The GXR is a capable camera and I remember correctly that it was popular with people who want to try out the M lenses. Had Ricoh developed the camera further over the years, I am sure it will be better now and costs less than the T. The sensor is modular so I do not understand why Ricoh will want to give up on this product line.

I hope Leica will develop the T further in future with new camera bodies and lenses as well just like what they did for the X series. First was the X1, then X2, XE and now the current Leica X.
 

If you use a smaller aperture setting, you can get better corner sharpness.

Whether full frame or APSC, the main difference would be the DOF.
 

Just wondering, why do you choose to shoot your A7 at 1/15 ISO 1600 instead of bumping the ISO to 3200 or 6400 even? I assure you that you will get shutter shake even with the M240

My D610 has less vibration from shutter than my M240, even with mirror slap and all.
 

Hi

It has been reported that even the corners are not perfect with the Leica T, as it doesn't have offset lenses on the sensor to correct light rays. So far, it seems only Ricoh with the GXR M mount sensor managed well.

Nex100 - you find the edges acceptable? Asking here cos I have not tried the T with rangefinder lenses.
I have both the M9 and A7. My 35 lux and 50lux performs well with the A7 - maybe a little more corner softness but that A7 + lux combination can't be beat the moment I needed to go above ISO 1600 :)

My little 35mm Summarit f2.5 performs exceptionally well with the A7. It seems to be better corrected for digital sensors.

Adapter variances could also contribute to edge problems. I settled on the Voigtlander ones in the end - the cheap China ones, even Metabones, feels too tight when I try to mount the M lenses.

Lastly, just to play devil's advocate, why not the Fuji XT1 or the rangefinder-esque XE2? You get a REAL shutter speed dial, coupled with the aperture rings on your lenses, give you perfect tactile control and feedback. It feels almost like using a rangefinder, except for the EVF finder (which on your T, you will have to use an electronic screen anyway…)
 

The corners are good with the 15mm, 35mm and 50mm on my T. On the A7 it is not so sharp on the corners.

For the Fuji XE, the corners are not so good as well. Corner details is simply not there. Not so good if you want to take pictures of buildings and landscape especially.

Difference between the shutter speeds when I take pictures.

T - 1/15s
A7 - 1/60s
Fuji - 1/0s

The focus peaking on the A7 is not as accurate especially when you use a bright lens wide open (e.g. 50mm f1.4). Problem with the A7 is that my favorite lens the ZM 50mm 1.5 Sonnar lens does not work well on it.

The shadow details on the T are really good if you shoot raw. Compatibility with the rangefinder lens is higher with the T than with the A7 or the Fuji.
 

Yeah, never liked the results I got from coupling RF lenses with my XE-1/2.

I use wide angles most of the time. A7? Forget about it.
 

But the T not having focus peaking is a major pain if you use manual lenses.
 

But the T not having focus peaking is a major pain if you use manual lenses.

if you use focus peaking enough, you will be surprised how inaccurate it is. focusing in magnification views is good for me.
 

Quite the contrary, it depends on how well you can use it.
 

if you use focus peaking enough, you will be surprised how inaccurate it is. focusing in magnification views is good for me.

Hello, your PM inbox is full. I wanna buy your lens but can't PM you...
 

Back
Top