The Contax T3 can produce pics that are similar in quality to a full size SLR in terms of pop, contrast and resolution the colour and look is similar to pictures from the Contax N 24-85mm zoom. Have seen an A3 sized portrait.
HiAnybody who has used the Leica CM or Minilux AND either of the Contax? I am especially interested to know if the CM can produce those 3D like images of the Contax G 45mm. Thinking of getting the Leica CM while they are still available.
I used minilux/T3/G45 before,at 8R,I find that T3 equal with leica,color diff only.
But G45 still have an edge,more brilliance up to corner.
However T3 is so small,really miss it.
Hi
I own a CM is a great P&S and my only reservation is the view finder is quite dim.
By the way CM has been discontinued and it is not easy to find a brand new one.
Just check out this link if you want for more info on the leica CM
http://carsonwilson.com/lcm/#facts
http://acielmd.cool.ne.jp/Minilux_club/bay/Leica_CMe.html
Cheers
Alvin
If you've looked through the viewfinder of both the G1 and G2, you'll know you're making a mistake going for the G1. Nothing wrong with getting a used body if it's still in good condition.
How is the viewfinder different between the G1 and G2? I have used the G2, but not the G1. I alsways get counfused by the automatic masking of the G2. :bsmilie:
How is the viewfinder different between the G1 and G2? I have used the G2, but not the G1. I alsways get counfused by the automatic masking of the G2. :bsmilie:
Were you able to get those nice 3D like images like the Contax G 45mm, sharp focussed subject with a nice creamy out of focus background, with the minilux?
Get both the G2 and T3! I think they complement each other. G2 for when you want a full versatile setup and the T3 for those times when you need something light and simple.
well,its good with minilux/T3 pic quality,but I still feel that G45 is best if u talk about max.resolution/bokeh to my taste.
Had both before, but sold them. Just that there were things about each camera that I could not adapt to. Now especially when i use it to take pics of my family, the G2 kinda puts my girl off her natural self when she hears the "woosh woosh" sound of the lens focusing.
Had both before, but sold them. Just that there were things about each camera that I could not adapt to. Now especially when i use it to take pics of my family, the G2 kinda puts my girl off her natural self when she hears the "woosh woosh" sound of the lens focusing.
..If u cant be satisfied with G2/T3,then you can forget about the miniature VF of minilux/G1,and I dont think CM be much better from the review pic of its VF,and all said CM pic quality=minilux though.
Put in this way,when I used/test minilux/G1,I sold them at once due to their un-usable dim/small VF PERSONALLY(read,my personal feel only and I wera specs)
When I used T3 and G2,aha,VF much better and good feel at hand,fun to shoot.
But due to my feel of R3a/eos 1V body/VF etc,I bite the bullet and sell them also,though I miss the smaller set up,cuteness of T3 and super nice of G lens.
Have you seen any 3D like pics from the Minilux? G45 is still my favourite, and my wife likes it too. If The CM can be anything close to the G45, she won't grumble so much with the new purchase. :bsmilie:
Pop like these?