hi, i am taking nite scene. Which one is better? Kodak 200 HD or normal ISO 400/800 films......? pls advice.. i need to scan the neg to digital.
Zerstorer said:There is no way to tell unless you are at the actual venue. I'd advise bringing a flash along. If the lighting is good, you may get 1/500 at f2.8(1/125@f5.6) if the lighting is poor, it can be 1/60@f4 or less even with ISO1600.
The shots that I posted recently were taken at 1/60@f2.8 even with ISO1600.
nickpower said:did u use flash in those recent shots? cos i was thinking, if i use flash wif ISO1600 films.... will the photo look white? becos of the harsh flash?
nickpower said:did u use flash in those recent shots? cos i was thinking, if i use flash wif ISO1600 films.... will the photo look white? becos of the harsh flash?
Zerstorer said:All shots had flash in them.
Prismatic: The new version of xtra800s are really sharp, but the 1600 does have amazingly fine grain. IMO it's a better alternative to 800 pushed one stop in terms of both colour and grain structure.
Prismatic said:Haven't tried the 1600s yet, but the 1600 is fujipress too iszit?
Thankfully, haven't had to resort to using 1600 for my assignments yet. Despite technology these days, grains on 1600 is very bad for publishing work.
Zerstorer said:I've tried 2 rolls of NPZ800, colours were good and natural with great skintones. However, its not a valid option for me since they are unavailable locally at any sane prices.
Zerstorer said:Will wait for you to be back then. I'm itching to try Impresa 50....no Konica shop in singapore has it. Even finding Konica Centuria Super 800 or 1600 is a difficult task.
LOL.finkster said:U ain't the only one itching man... :bsmilie: