Just got a CZ 16-80 with CZ MC filter

[simranjits]

Would this be considered good bokeh? Its from the Cz 16-80 , i think its quite nice.

 

[DuckRice]

how much is the CZ MC filter??

can PM me if you dun feel like saying here....

 

[jasbay]

Would this be considered good bokeh? Its from the Cz 16-80 , i think its quite nice.

for aps-c standard, yes it is good bokeh.

http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=445868

top notch "kongo bokeh" in my opinion.

 

[ninelives]

for aps-c standard, yes it is good bokeh.

http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=445868

top notch "kongo bokeh" in my opinion.

that dude really pro.:thumbsup:

 

[boombox]

Would this be considered good bokeh? Its from the Cz 16-80 , i think its quite nice.

I think the 16-80 has pretty decent bokeh - do note that there's a bit of outlining - the greens of the plants - the bokeh edges of the leaves and the stalks show up as faint lines, looking quite different from the quality of the blur of the persons hair (the blur patch of black). This is still considered generally quite pleasing to many - as usually these leaves and stalks are pretty challenging to reproduce pleasingly in bokeh.

For a medium telephoto, this kind of bokeh is already quite impressive.

Compare this to samples from the 135STF - which is arguably the ultimate benchmark for bokeh reproduction today:
http://www.the135stf.net/samples.html

135STF - sample shot - with a similarly busy background:
http://www.the135stf.net/samples.html#galleries/new/Caught_in_a_net.jpg