It's 2005, who still use film?
- Thread starter whoelse
- Start date
- Status
icarus said:bought mine at fotohub.. cant remember the price...
Superia 100 is not my usual film.. i use Provia/Superia400/HP5/Delta 400 most often
Bought the superia 100 to use for fireworks, but i ended up using sensia 100 instead
:bsmilie:
haha. okok
i use superior200/fp4 most of the time.
trying out superior 100 cos i heard its finer in terms of grain.
anyway trying out lots of flims and slides.
i still got a roll of velvia 50 and provia 100f to shoot with.
gonna play around with slide for awhile till i get the hang of them :bsmilie:
dreamtheatre said:SUper agree with you:thumbsup:
At least it will be some time before you can do multiple exposure on a dslr ...hahhaaa
with respect,
this is like saying,
"i don't wear pants cos u got to remove pants to fart."
dslr don't need to do multiple exposure to have the same effect,
but i do think D2X has it.
1 ques,
how many rolls of film you go thru
b4 u learn to do multiple exposure right?
the power of digital,
on the spot check and correct and LEARN!
something that film plus polaroid can't even give.
judeseah said:how many rolls of film you go thru
b4 u learn to do multiple exposure right?
the power of digital,
on the spot check and correct and LEARN!
something that film plus polaroid can't even give.
One frame. (talking about exposure only!)
And I did not even have to look at the LCD.
The power of knowing light.
What has that to do with the type of image sensor?
LazerLordz
New Member
Me.I still use film for projects and gigs.
student said:
i m IMPRESSED!!!
it took u only a single frame to learn the art of multiple exposure?
with tons of books,
3 teachers,
it took me 2 mths and 16 rolls(2rolls per week) of film
b4 i got my ME pic acceptable,
both the outdoor and flash type.
guess i m stupid, thats all,
all the more i m for digital now.
judeseah said:
No, I did not take one frame to LEARN an image of multiple exposure. The first frame of multiple exposure I made was, exposure-wise, spot on. And the "technique? Really simple. As simple as knowing how film and light works, and how much light you want to put on that film.There was really nothing to it.
Understand this, and your multiple exposures will work fine. Whether the image has artistic quality is aonther matter.
You don't need tons of books, and multiple teachers, especially those who surrender their thinking (at least about light) to computer chips.
You just need to know how much light you need and how to put that on your film. If you are willing to let the computer chips do your thinking about light for you, that is fine. One can make good images that way.
But I prefer to do things the old fashion way.
Tournament Manager
New Member
I'm looking for volunteer to take photos for two basketball final matches on 17th Dec from 6.30-9.30pm. Transport allowance is $30. If it is ok with you, please contact Mike at 96166447. Thank you.
Tournament Manager said:
:thumbsd: lame.. if you're decently looking for volunteers, why's the need to post irrelevantly all over these forums..... ! :kok:
http://forums.clubsnap.org/search.php?searchid=2372037 :kok: again!
hongsien said:It just boils down to adding and subtracting (dividing is a form of subtracting)........so, go back to school you!
HS
i will gladly go back to school,
but who will support my family then?
jude
ps- maybe someone here can post a ME pic? using film.
so far seen many, but impressed by few.
multiple expsure pic is not SIMPLY exposing the film several times,
got a spoilt cam that does that.
though jaw jaw is better than war war,
but talk here is useless unless u hv a pic to back u, right?
judeseah said:
Well, staying at 1 Dalvey ?
Anyway, my school is the world famous "School of Common Sense". Somehow I do not remember having to spend a lot of money on this.
judeseah said:
You have to differentiate between getting a proper exposure and getting a good image. With today's all singing all dancing electronic marvels, it is easy to get decent exposures. But see the amount of trash around!
The same applies to multiple exposures. It is not at all difficult to get decent exposure with multiple exposures. But getting a great image is another. As I mentioned in my previous post, making an artistic meaningful image is another matter.
I will post an example of a multiple exposure image tomorrow. Taken on film. It will not be a great art. But it was fun to me.
student said:
search high n low for the original xchange.
guess i didn't ans ur last question.
typical ME for me,
same scene with a moving object(usually a person) moving,
background must be correctly exposed,
5-8 shots taken,
preferably with the exposure of the object
going from lighter to darker.
isn't it easier with a digital than film?
but we digress,
the original person who post the ME thread,
mentioned something like u can't do ME with digital.
jude
ps-school of common sense, oxymoronic. the commoners usually hv no sense.
pps-S3Pro can do ME too.
chris wong
New Member
am still a old school person....still using film..
chris wong
New Member
i some how feel that photo in film look nicer....
angalphoto
Member
Even though I have canon 10D.S50 and Casio P700(7 meg) digital, I still use film camera for travel.I use to bring Leica R8, TLR Rollieflex GS 2.8 Planner(Expression model) .Canon 1V and Bronica ETRSI 645 and GS 67.
- Status
