i said that i felt nothing. i never turned up my nose and said that "hey, there's nothing great about this artwork" - i just thought that a lot of the people who were exclaiming at this or that in the louvre were just being fanboys for the sake of joining the jones.
anyways, no big deal, it's just a view i have about art.
we take what we will from it, don't you think? maybe you prefer learning more about this or that - another hated branch of study is history, it bores me. sometimes i like to find out about certain things, so that particular branch of history excites me.. beyond that.. :sweat: so perhaps you might better see where i'm coming from.
I won't deny there will be those at the Louvre who try to act cultured (similar to the Emperor's New Clothes).
I won't deny, like you, history bores me too. But it also opens up my eyes. It is more of one thing leads to another. You see many Singaporeans complaining about Singapore. They do not understand the history and so their opinions will not be the same as one who does.
You can't quantify an opinion, but there is a difference between an educated opinion and an uninformed one. I think is clear you can see many of the works here are simply people who attempt to do stuff with very superficial knowledge. I am not saying by knowing the history of photography you will be some great photographer, but it makes a difference in the thinking that goes behind your work. Anyone who is truly interested should do a little reading.
Like you said, it is an opinion. If people are happy being the hobbyist and showing off how sharp their lens is, then I guess it is their call. But if they are interested in pushing it beyond, why not start by trying to understand this craft more, beyond just apertures and shutter speeds.
For anyone reading this, all I hope is that they will look at things differently and not just on a superficial level. For any other experts out there, feel free to add on what you know.
I would like to see this more of a sharing session than of a debate

Last edited: