O
Originally posted by stk
2mp is good for 4R.. but 3mp is even better for 4R..
Originally posted by ckiang
At 4R? No diff one. When you print negs, the scans are at 1800 by 1200 anyway, that's very close to your typical 1600x1200 2mp cams.
Regards
CK
Originally posted by stk
I feel got a bit of diff lah. 2mp for 4R would actually be 1600x1067, whereas 1800x1200 would be more ideal for 4R. Maybe depends on how closely one scrutinises the photos.. Or perhaps it's because my 3mp camera produces better pics than my previous 2mp camera..
Originally posted by ckiang
If you send the 3mp image, and a resized 2mp image (from the 3mp file), they should look the same at 4R size.
Originally posted by stk
That would be the best way to know.. who wanna spend money to verify?? ;p
Still feel that if u look close enough should be able to see a difference..
Originally posted by stk
That would be the best way to know.. who wanna spend money to verify?? ;p
Still feel that if u look close enough should be able to see a difference..
Originally posted by lennon
I agree, photos from higher resolution camera is more vivid.
not all, some 2MP cameras has far more features than 3 or 4MP camerasOriginally posted by newuser
The 2MP camera and the 3MP camera will have to be similar to be fair, since 3MP cameras tend to have better features than a 2MP camera.
Originally posted by newuser
I have seen 3 A4 sizes prints (equivlant to 8R) from a IXUS V2 (2MP), IXUS 330 (3MP) and the S45 (4MP).
Originally posted by mpenza
Vivid in terms of color?
Originally posted by lennon
Yes, vivid in terms of color. Put it this way, 3mp photo printed in 4R should be better than 2mp printed in 4R since they dont have the same number of pic elements, 3mp in 4R is more compact.
Originally posted by mpenza
Erm... don't think I buy this. "Vividness" has little to do with number of pic elements. A 2MP pic can be more vivid than a 6MP pic and will print out more vivid. Two pics that looked as vivid on the monitor will turn out as vivid. If you don't believe me, take a 3MP pic and print it at 4R. For the same image file, resample it to 2MP (using bicubic or other more sophisticated algorithm) and print it out at the same 4R size. Let us know if the first printout is more vivid.
I'm more willing to accept the argument that the level of details in the printout is higher for a 3MP pic compared to a 2MP pic.