If you know your Nikon, Guess what he has.


Status
Not open for further replies.
:eek: :eek: :eek: cannot imagine how much will that lens cost...:dunno:
 

It's a Nikon F4 alright, but you're all wrong on the lens. I mean, as we all know, why would any proper photographer be using Nikon glass? So many people think that USM and IS is the bees knees and change to Canon to get better results. This guy went one better, he kept his F4 but adapted the Canon 2000mm f22 (max aperture doesn't matter, it has IS after all!) with two stacked TCs, and then cleverly stuck the Nikon label on to fool everybody.
 

interesting...that the IS mechanism works across brands and with stacked TC some more!

2000 f/22 x 1.4 x 1.4 getting a 4000 f/44, wowz....:confused: my head is spinning

andrew
 

wah...look like it is powerful enough for some planets shots
 

Originally posted by Jed
It's a Nikon F4 alright, but you're all wrong on the lens. I mean, as we all know, why would any proper photographer be using Nikon glass? So many people think that USM and IS is the bees knees and change to Canon to get better results. This guy went one better, he kept his F4 but adapted the Canon 2000mm f22 (max aperture doesn't matter, it has IS after all!) with two stacked TCs, and then cleverly stuck the Nikon label on to fool everybody.

ooooo..........
 

Originally posted by PentiumPC
As the saying goes "Ang mo tua ki"

:eek:


:bsmilie: :bsmilie: :bsmilie:
 

Originally posted by Jed
It's a Nikon F4 alright, but you're all wrong on the lens. I mean, as we all know, why would any proper photographer be using Nikon glass? So many people think that USM and IS is the bees knees and change to Canon to get better results. This guy went one better, he kept his F4 but adapted the Canon 2000mm f22 (max aperture doesn't matter, it has IS after all!) with two stacked TCs, and then cleverly stuck the Nikon label on to fool everybody.

WOw, just wondering how you found that out....
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top