How's this lens : EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III


Status
Not open for further replies.
oh... btw you were saying that the 3rd party 75-300 is better than the mk III of the canon version? Or were you comparing with the L lenses?
 

duhduh83 said:
oh... btw you were saying that the 3rd party 75-300 is better than the mk III of the canon version? Or were you comparing with the L lenses?

Well, you get what you pay for, so I'm not comparing lenses that are going to cost 4-15X more. A fair comparision should be with equivalent lenses from 3rd party with similar prices. The Sigma 70-300mm APO DG Macro in my opinion has a slightly better sharpness and contrast, but the difference is hardly noticeable. What I hate about the Sigma is that the focusing speed is so slow, and it really hunt in low light. I have tested both Canon and Sigma lense under similar conditions after my bro-in-law complained about his Sigma's slow speed. The Sigma do have an advantage of having a closer minimum focusing distance, thus the designation of macro. Maybe my bro-in-law's Sigma could be a bad copy.
 

ok.... just for opinions.... would you choose 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III or 90-300mm f/4-5.6 or a third party 75-300mm ???
 

Well, so far I've gotten only 1 good shot out of this particular lens.

Prolly either due to my inexperience with this lens since I owned this lens for just 3mths into my journey of photography over a year and half ago.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top