Could some kind soul post an example of a "near-perfect" histogram to target for .....so that less experienced fellas like myself can learn & improve. I am starting to try shooting more in manual mode as compared to program mode of my 350D ...success rate at most 50% (cos using LCD) & family members find it really hard to let me take 10 shots per pose ...haha. Pls help. Thanks.
cheers
Took some wedding photo recently . The exposure of the photo on the LCD screen look ok , so carry on shooting . But when i reach home and tranfer the photo on the computor the photo look under expose.
question : Do you guys look at the histogram or LCD screen for exposure;p
Could some kind soul post an example of a "near-perfect" histogram to target for .....so that less experienced fellas like myself can learn & improve.
This one not exactly perfect, but closest I could find :embrass:
Basically you want most of the info to be in the middle, or slanted one side is okay too, just not cut off horribly like in the first two (too dark and too bright respectively). The third one is more like it, but still can see some got cut off at both ends.
![]()
Hi what if the picture is a night scene and intended to be dark. How do we know the correct exposure for the night scene since the histogram will be on the left side? Thanks.
Something that looks like this (drawn, not an actual histogram) will be a dark pic. Just flip horizontally if it's meant to be the high-key type.
Edit: Don't think the peaks matter as long as they aren't cut-off. The pic look nice can already, why worry so much? ^_^
Personally I like live view a lot better than squinting through the tiny view finder. Rather use the play-back to compose if I have time.
Oh btw, a small request: if quoting my reply, please take out the image, because I have to pay for extra bandwidth if it exceed the limit.