clive said:
mmm ifeel its sharp enuff.. unless under a microscope then maybe can see faint signs of cam shake..
You know, this is part of serious advice and I'm not trying to have a go at you or anything. But seriously, this statement just backs up the belief that perhaps you have your standards set way too low. I cannot imagine anyone who has genuinely reached the top in photography being confident in saying that they can hand hold a camera steady for a full second, and then back that up by saying that his 4R print is passable.
You need to aim higher, I cannot honestly remember the last time I based sharpness or anything else on the basis of a 4R print.
4 .for dear jed and other equally puzzled people..those royal sons empire thing are just flowery language used to describe how life was liek back in 1992~1995. its kinda like a private joke thing..haha..u got to be in that famous school durign those years to fully get the picture..lolz so..yah, its just a private joke.. but yeah those were the good ol days man =)
Actually, I'm still no closer to understanding you. And the strange thing is, I was "in that famous school during those years" and I still don't in the least fully get that picture. At all.
The ironic thing is that you and I seem to have a fair bit in common. That "famous school", followed by the "famous" junior college (although I hasten to add that I didn't get thrown out), and then on to photography. We're both also 25. Admittedly, I will probably struggle to swim a single lap these days, forget 3.8km in 2.5hr as in your signature. But at the same time, I reckon (although I'm not claiming) I've done more in photography than you have, and on no account am I at the stage where I think that I have reached the top, let alone using that as the lead into a rather staggering claim that, in short, boils down to "I have arrived, accomplished everything I set out to do, and I'm bored now, nothing much poses a challenge any more".
The difference between you and me is, I'm still loving photography as much as the day I first picked up the camera, if not a whole lot more. You need to discover that love, otherwise clearly photography is not for you. If owning and using 1 series bodies and pro lenses is all that used to drive you, then clearly you are more of a technophile than a photographer. I own all that and more but for me it's just an avenue to take more, and hopefully better images.
And finally, a point that has already been made numerous times in this thread in many different ways. To borrow your language RE physical fitness, you are an "egotistical individual who is more arrogant than 90% of any randomly selected peers (circa 1979)." Try to sort that out too.
PS you still haven't answered my question. Are you at the top and have no where to go as per your first post, or are you a complete failure in life intermittently wracked by brain numbing bouts of clinical depression?