By the way, i'm considering a 35mm f2 to complement my 50mm f1.8 and possibly a 85mm f1.8 or 100mm f2 for low light action stopping. I'll prolly hang on to my standard zoom just for the wide angle needs, though I don't shoot wide angle very often at all.
Any thoughts ? I know somebody will bring up the incredible 35L and 135L but fact is, i can't afford them. Hah
wow so there are alot of people who are already trapped in this proverbial abyss haha.
Perhaps some real world experience would help with insight into this. To me the advantages are obvious but I'm sure there must be a whole load of disadvantages. So for the exclusive prime users, what are your biggest frustrations when using primes ? I suppose it'll have something to do with changing lenses all the time or carrying a variety of primes ? Though i think the second point is probably neglectable since most primes are light anyways..
hv u ever tried vintage manual lens?
it's addicted too...
i love the color of old takumar lens...
hahahaha
But the one thing that holds me back is the convenience of zooms and superzooms, especially since I take mostly street and portraiture.
SumoBear said:I am a prime lover too but my pocket is not as deep as others who can own a library of primes. Started off with a 50mm F1.4 and recently added a Sigma 30mm F1.4 that is permanently mounted to my 60D. I do have a 17-55 F2.8 which I feel really bad for neglecting it, usage is low.