This one is very easy http://www.hdrsoft.com/
anyway. please do a search within the forums...
HDR has been discussed before recently only.... last month IIRC.
can also be done with 2 frames with 2 exposures
beautiful. The problem with 2 frames is that the scene must be static. no wind, no moving trees, etc. Not to mention that you have have a tripod...
Basically don't we all want a camera that can capture the entire range from dark to light in one raw file?
working with 2 files offer more flexibility in terms of the range of editing that can be done before image quality gets affected negatively.
i offer it as an option. the frame i wanted is wider than what my widest lens can take, therefore 2 frames, and because of that 2 exposures. whether HDR is used or not, composition must always come first. HDR is afterall an effect, not an end
ya lar. Your pictures are really very nice and you have higher photographic standards (not sacarstic )
For me, photography is basically snapping my wife on my holidays and HDR is basically getting backlited subjects to come out ok. not with a burnt out skies but with beautiful blue skies and white clouds with details and form. I seldom have the leisure or time on my holidays to set up tripod and neither can my wife hold still for that long to take multiple exposures.
So the best I can do is single RAW file exposure on the widest dynamic range camera I can afford.
so should i do a single exposure of 2 exposure shots or varying EV? how much difference should the EV be between 2 shots?
i'm using a Nikon D80