Guess the ISO setting

[chengsing]

riding on.. does using a good lens vs normal consumer lens affects the noise also?

assuming same F stops & lighting conditions..?

 

[miniUltraman]

Ee chit... ok raw...

Moving on, perhaps someone can post a comparsion of the various pictures from the various DSLRs on their highest ISO setting? Then make a vote to guess which belongs to which and disclose the answer again in end Aug? :bsmilie:

I will choose to disclose end of 2007 :bsmilie:

 

[Bosty]

TS wanna torture everyone n keep everyone in suspense lolx

 

[miniUltraman]

TS wanna torture everyone n keep everyone in suspense lolx

No lah... actually it is obvious it is iso6400 :bsmilie: And I got to agree.. putting iso1600, 3200, 6400 side by side, you probably can't differentiate their noise by looking at them!

 

[xunjas]

CANON noise control is very good.. even 30D @ iso 3200 photos also look great. =D

 

[An drew]

Since we can get such clean shots at 6400, which is a 6-stop advantage from ISO 100, do we still need image stabilization for general photography?

 

[zj2000]

Since we can get such clean shots at 6400, which is a 6-stop advantage from ISO 100, do we still need image stabilization for general photography?

A resounding Yes!!!!!! Only when iso 6400 start looking like iso 100 will the powers of IS have no effect on me....

edit: sentence should read: .....the powers of IS have 'less' effect on me....

 

[An drew]

A resounding Yes!!!!!! Only when iso 6400 start looking like iso 100 will the powers of IS have no effect on me....

edit: sentence should read: .....the powers of IS have 'less' effect on me....

Yes, but even 1600 already gives a 4-stop advantage. The 2nd generation IS are only good for 3-4 stops.

 

[miniUltraman]

Yes, but even 1600 already gives a 4-stop advantage. The 2nd generation IS are only good for 3-4 stops.

No matter how good noise control... still cannot compare with iso100 clean image. So IS will help to fulfill that desire :lovegrin:

 

[An drew]

No matter how good noise control... still cannot compare with iso100 clean image. So IS will help to fulfill that desire :lovegrin:

ok. i got your point.

 

[cantaresg]

Haha. And tripod will achieve more. And cheaper.

 

[An drew]

Haha. And tripod will achieve more. And cheaper.

Yeah, can still shoot like Ansel Adams. Dun need anything more than ISO 25 with tripod.

 

[All Blue]

TS is a 1D guy. So i vote 6400. He has to prove me wrong. Ha Ha.

 

[Fumiryu]

TS is a 1D guy. So i vote 6400. He has to prove me wrong. Ha Ha.

Sorry, voting over, results already released on 31 July 2007.......

 

[aloyyolaaloy]

BBB! 1DmkIII :bsmilie:

 

[USM]

BBB! 1DmkIII :bsmilie:

Bro, don't tempt me leh.....

 

[xunjas]

No matter how good noise control... still cannot compare with iso100 clean image. So IS will help to fulfill that desire :lovegrin:

Bro, i choose iso 50. =D even lower noise..

 

[Fumiryu]

BBB! 1DmkIII :bsmilie:

Go ahead

 

[Fumiryu]

No lah... actually it is obvious it is iso6400 :bsmilie: And I got to agree.. putting iso1600, 3200, 6400 side by side, you probably can't differentiate their noise by looking at them!

Maybe I should put pix of ISO 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200 and 6400, side by side to compare......

 

[armadillo]

Maybe I should put pix of ISO 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200 and 6400, side by side to compare......

If you don't mind, will keen to see that comparison