...........
IMHO, a wedding film has to be true to what took place. Meaning, try not to disturb the process. I personally regard posed-actions as cheesy. AD wedding videographers are engaged to document the day and present it in the most beautiful/interesting way he can, not to direct the "actors" and "actresses" to play out certain scenes that the videorgrapher had thought of. I've seen local works (at bridal fairs) where the videographers asks the Jie-meis to look "devilish" at the bittergourd, etc.... I almost flipped over. I've also seen an enacted shot of the bride's door opening slowly to simulate the groom's perspective as he enters her room after gatecrashing... it was so un-natural! A good videographer do not need such scenes to tell the story or bring out the mood of the day. You don't even need words or titling to explain your story. If a videographer does need words to move the story, he has failed.
Hmmmm... Personally, I kinda disagree with these points.
Well, in the sense that, let's compare it to a simple analogy of photography.
In documenting an event such as a wedding, the photographer traditionally has to document the event and take both non-posed shots and the prerequisite posed ones, right?
So, why can't, whenever possible and time and process is not really a constraint, the ones captured in the video 'pose' and act out a very short scene? I am sure many people would not mind hamming it up for the videocamera, on such a special day and event, when they are all dressed up to the nines. Right?
Thus, I believe personally, that some scenes need to be simulated (but not overdone) to make the whole production more seamless, and not jerky (pace wise). I don't believe that all Singaporean-made videos can make use of the excuse of venue not nice lah, what lah and produce a sub par video template that everyone in the future will accept as the norm. That'll be a creative nightmare!!
I believe, like most things in life, it is largely situational. You have to adapt and think on your feet but make sure that a certain standard is maintained.
So, to me - a good production is definitely something like almost a movie, where there are build ups to scenes, accompanied by appropriate music (not run of the mill Top 40s), and definitely NOT every chance you get, you pan here and there and everywhere.
If you notice in movie credits, there will be someone in charge of photography, because photography is imperative in video, elements of professional photography has to incorporated in any good video production. What more, in a video for something as important as a wedding, which documents a once in a lifetime event (hopefully ;p) about beautiful memories for a couple and their loved ones.
The first time I saw Stillmotion's Johanna + David's wedding video - I was so moved. Everything was perfect. It was practically cinema quality, and everything was fused together oh so seamlessly. I guess it's the mindset of Caucasians that they won't act awkward in front of the cameras, they are naturally photogenic, helps that their architecture is so inspirationally beautiful, and when captured with professional equipment and edited with creativity, it becomes a work of art.
And that's what I hope videographers aim to produce - works of art.
ps After all that I have said with regards to your points, I still find your works at
http://www.alvinadelineweddings.com to be the standard local upcoming videographers should at least achieve. They are indeed very nice.
