Good questionSo is it a design problem with the RF603, or P mode, or Nikon?
See above. YN would not know what to 'say'. I suspect the YN flash trigger just does enough the be recognized at TTL compatible flash, nothing else. It uses the trigger signal from hotshoe to fire the remote flash. Done.I find it quite strange that the RF 603 didn't send a disable HSS by default.
Good questionNikon won't care about YN (as a cheaper competitor to its own flash devices), YN will blame Nikon for not releasing details .. Till the cow comes home or YN succeeds in reverse engineering.
See above. YN would not know what to 'say'. I suspect the YN flash trigger just does enough the be recognized at TTL compatible flash, nothing else. It uses the trigger signal from hotshoe to fire the remote flash. Done.
Thanks
Actually, I think they do. Their YN622 is HSS enabled so it appears to me that they know what command to return to the body to feedback whether HSS is on or off... Even before the YN622, their YN568 flash also has HSS...
HSS is Canon.. different from Nikon.. one speaks hokkien the other speaks Cantonese..
nikon has hss.
Oh yar.. u r right to highlight my ignorance.. just Google it and a good explanation is available
http://www.scantips.com/lights/flashbasics2b.html
Seems the issue is this the flash being triggered wireless from the transmitter... n not from horseshoe..
HORSEshoe and HOTshoe are 2 different things.
Thanks
Actually, I think they do. Their YN622 is HSS enabled so it appears to me that they know what command to return to the body to feedback whether HSS is on or off... Even before the YN622, their YN568 flash also has HSS...
Most of the cheaper ttl triggers just do a simple read and relay. So what ever signal goes in and out is read and sent via rf then conveyed. Not much techonology involved. So it reads and relay signals from all contact points.
For non ttl triggers, they just read the center trigger voltage then orders the other units to fire as well.
No, it doesn't matter whether original or third party. In both cases laymen need to learn a few things to make knowledgeable decisions about settings. Most important: learn about the basics of flash photography and the capabilities of the equipment.In layman terms.. means use original, wouldn't go wrong.. use third party, must know the correct settings?
they don't look alike too...
![]()
![]()
Thanks
Actually, I think they do. Their YN622 is HSS enabled so it appears to me that they know what command to return to the body to feedback whether HSS is on or off... Even before the YN622, their YN568 flash also has HSS...
In layman terms.. means use original, wouldn't go wrong.. use third party, must know the correct settings?
Doing any sort of flash photography, must know correct settings. No matter original or not, TTL or not.
But what I wrote in my last post has nothing whatsoever to do with original or 3rd party. Wonder how you managed to extrapolate to that.
In layman terms.. means use original, wouldn't go wrong.. use third party, must know the correct settings?
The RF-603 is a simple wireless trigger system without i-TTL and HSS capability. It does not matter Whether the flash is Nikon or 3rd patry with HSS feature. Like Octarine said " It uses the trigger signal from hotshoe to fire the remote flash" that's all, no recognition, no feedback, no msg.
Most of the cheaper ttl triggers just do a simple read and relay. So what ever signal goes in and out is read and sent via rf then conveyed. Not much techonology involved. So it reads and relay signals from all contact points.
For non ttl triggers, they just read the center trigger voltage then orders the other units to fire as well.
"Most cheaper ttl.. " the last I check.. most original flash r easily 3times more than third party flash.. ie the simple sb400 cost abt $400 while the Yong nuo 560 iii only $100?
can't help but generalized the price effect here..
http://dpanswers.com/content/rev_radio_yn.php
well... that's why people pay top dollar for 3rd Party trigger that support the TTL pass through.
some examples:
http://www.pixelhk.com/Proshow.aspx?id=170
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/0304434791/accessory-review-phottix-odin-ttl-flash-trigger-for-canon-