night86mare
Deregistered
ah. yes, i get what you mean by that example. i forgot to mention that i was fine if i could see the purpose for such lighting. sometimes, especially in those examples i had raised earlier, i just can't.Hi night86mare, just to share my thoughts. If the different lighting ratio is done skillfully, such that a nice contrast is achieved, then I don't think there should be any problem even if one can tell straightaway that flash is being used? Take for example, Joe Mcnally's works?
would it be more acceptable if a picture is taken with someone near a small window (but you don't see the window), and the sun highlights the face much more than the rest of the body and give it the same effect? i've seen some pics taken using natural light where the placement of the subject just doesn't look nice.
that's fine to me, actually, in such a situation you would be able to tell that it's sunlight, i think.
like i've said, i'm fine with the effect if it achieves a purpose. unfortunately, most of them just seem to be mistakes.
it is like ranting about tilted photographs, if the tilt achieves a positive purpose, then i won't be ranting about it per se, would i?
