Expensive fungus lens


JasonB

Deregistered
Just to share, it's often not worth the trouble and risk buying a fungus-ed lens. If you were offered at second hand shops or BNS, think carefully.

Especially if the fungus had been there for a long time; ie; especially those old lenses, because Fungus feed on lens coatings, the longer it is there, the more serious the damage. And the damage is irreversible and permanent, in a financially sound sense.

How much to pay for a fungus-ed lens? Answer is don't buy it.

Assuming common pre owned price for a certain lens is $600, lens cleaning cost $120 to $200 (I know there are cheaper options but it is not always available, trustable or time practical, you don't want to wait a year for lense cleaning... Lets just treat as $200 to factor in the trouble, time and transport fees to get it fixed. So that brings down the price to $400, but remember this is a lens that suffered fungus, very likely its coating was damaged, there's chance of recurring outbreak with the right conditions, there's chance of it infecting other gear.

So I personally won't pay more than 50% of that $400 so max is $200, for such a small difference of few hundred dollars, I rather look for a healthy lens and not worry about using good money to buy frustration and anguish.
 

Sounds like you've got the deal?
 

Helped my coll sold his fungus infested Nikon 70-300mm VR for $200 on BnS a couple of weeks back... you will not believe the amount of phone calls i received + the usual lowballers...
I was surprised that the lens was snapped up the day itself. Personally i will not get a fungus lens even at rock bottom prices..
 

Helped my coll sold his fungus infested Nikon 70-300mm VR for $200 on BnS a couple of weeks back... you will not believe the amount of phone calls i received + the usual lowballers...
I was surprised that the lens was snapped up the day itself. Personally i will not get a fungus lens even at rock bottom prices..

Yeah probably people who go for cheap everything without thinking 'cheap' might cost one even more money.
 

Yeah probably people who go for cheap everything without thinking 'cheap' might cost one even more money.

Some cleaning only cost $65 and take 2 weeks so maybe they are thinking they can give it a try. They just take a gamble on whether the lens coating had been eaten into by the fungus.
 

Some cleaning only cost $65 and take 2 weeks so maybe they are thinking they can give it a try. They just take a gamble on whether the lens coating had been eaten into by the fungus.

If it's a recent lens and the infection light and in early stage, may consider, IF the price is rightfully low. For old lenses, forget it.

And you have the right to lowball a fungus lens.
 

The problem is not just coating. Fungus secrete acid. Over long periods, it is not just coatings that are damaged. I have seen real permanent marks left on elements even after the fungus is removed.
 

The problem is not just coating. Fungus secrete acid. Over long periods, it is not just coatings that are damaged. I have seen real permanent marks left on elements even after the fungus is removed.

Yes, like a mottled surface, ever seen glass window stains from an old building? No matter how you wipe with window cleaner or even kerosene, its still murky.

Thus said damage is permanent save changing that piece of glass, which might as well buy a new lens.
 

Back
Top