EOS M: M for Mirrorless

[rain5533]

The important can play with "L" lenses.

Or 50 & 85 L

Wu Wu

 

[rain5533]

4 colors.

Lady will be focus on white or red

 

[milez]

Size comparison

More comparison shots

 

[rain5533]

Size comparison

More comparison shots

Good design for everyday cam

 

[daniel00]

Anyone know if is possible to use my current sigma via the adapter?:dunno:

 

[rain5533]

Anyone know if is possible to use my current sigma via the adapter?:dunno:

EF & EF-S compatible

http://shashinki.com/shop/canon-eosm-digital-camera-with-22mm-lens-black-p-10623.html#!tab1

Need adaptor only

 

[MichaelLee]

EF & EF-S compatible

ShaShinKi.com ~ Malaysia's First & Largest Online Camera Shop!

Need adaptor only

with adapter, it need at least 1 sec to focus. for tele range, my guess is close to 2sec.

 

[panamera]

hmm... i'm not that excited with this camera
see how later when it's really out... maybe the picture quality is better than what's on the review.

 

[MichaelLee]

If the review is good and the price affordable... plan to use it with my EF 100-400mm :bsmilie:

if your review with 100-400mm is good, may be some one can try 1200mm on EOS M !!!

 

[eleveninth]

if your review with 100-400mm is good, may be some one can try 1200mm on EOS M !!!

lol! really become lens cap!

i think I've more or less decided on getting this already.

 

[MichaelLee]

i think I've more or less decided on getting this already.

If the AF with adapter L lens take mot more than 1 sec, likely I would also consider this cam + 70-200mm f4 IS

 

[MichaelLee]

Ops, nicely slow. :O

approx 2.5 sec to AF ??

 

[An drew]

While the Olympus OM-D now has state of the art 5-axis image stabilization, the Canon M has none. I find that some stabilization is useful especially when you are not shooting through a VF. And while the new EFM-18-55 is stabilized, the 22mm is not.

 

[MechaEd]

While the Olympus OM-D now has state of the art 5-axis image stabilization, the Canon M has none. I find that some stabilization is useful especially when you are not shooting through a VF. And while the new EFM-18-55 is stabilized, the 22mm is not.

Why would you need a 22mm lens to be stabilized? Unless you're shooting video of course.

And I think we should hold off comparing the EOS-M to the OMD until Canon actually releases a high-end MILC.

 

[MichaelLee]

Canon actually releases a high-end MILC.

may be beginning of next year, there is 1Dm

 

[An drew]

Why would you need a 22mm lens to be stabilized? Unless you're shooting video of course.

And I think we should hold off comparing the EOS-M to the OMD until Canon actually releases a high-end MILC.

This is an interchangeable lens camera so I can be using my 135L on it.

Even the low end Oly like the E-PM1 is stabilized. Looks like I will have to hold on to my Oly body a little longer.

 

[milez]

may be beginning of next year, there is 1Dm

hmm, ... will be interesting...
EOS M1
EOS M5
EOS M7
EOS M70
EOS M700
EOS M1300

 

[MechaEd]

This is an interchangeable lens camera so I can be using my 135L on it.

Even the low end Oly like the E-PM1 is stabilized. Looks like I will have to hold on to my Oly body a little longer.

Yeah but the Pany MFT bodies are also all not stabilized.

I've actually always wondered why Canon and Nikon went with lens stabilization instead of in-body stabilization for all their bodies. But I'm digressing.

 

[An drew]

Yeah but the Pany MFT bodies are also all not stabilized.

I've actually always wondered why Canon and Nikon went with lens stabilization instead of in-body stabilization for all their bodies. But I'm digressing.

Lens stabilization is probably superior at this moment and also good for profits.

 

[milez]

Lens stabilization is probably superior at this moment and also good for profits.

... true until the 5 axis stabilizer appear