Eos 7D ???


Status
Not open for further replies.
Finally something to compare to the d300 :bsmilie:
 

The D90 is to the D300 as what the 500D is to the 50D:bsmilie:
 

I think we are giving the D300 too much credit. In my opinion D300 is just a So-So camera, nothing much to be WOW about.

like that, even 7D also nothing much to be WOW. :D
 

I think we are giving the D300 too much credit. In my opinion D300 is just a So-So camera, nothing much to be WOW about.

Curious. Why do you say that? Because it's not FF?
 

Curious. Why do you say that? Because it's not FF?
Perhaps coz he shoots with 1-series.. Must admit, 1-series has got great appeal. Was :bheart: for a while when I sold my 1D3.
 

Curious. Why do you say that? Because it's not FF?

It is just a newer camera which was created to challenge the 1DM3 launch, and therefore carries newer bells and whistle (they have to, else no one will buy their products). 50D was created as an update to 40D by just having more MP. The new brand's newer model will beats its features and then the cycle goes on. 7D has some wow...may be for 2-3mths then Sony might come out with something, then Nikon again......:dunno: Improvement made to the image....marginal.

If you asked me, comparing image quality of D300, is it significantly better then 50D? Is there anything that the D300 can do which affect the image quality so much that the 50D can't? To me the answer is "not really".

We have reached a technological stage where image quality is starting to tapper off. Therefore new launch of camera body don't really excite me so much as compared to the new launch of new lenses. Especially the L lenses.
 

launch of new lenses. Especially the L lenses.
Yup, 100/2.8L IS Macro.. will be the shortest EF prime lens with IS :thumbsup: Hope the rumours are real coz I can't wait..
 

I think we are giving the D300 too much credit. In my opinion D300 is just a So-So camera, nothing much to be WOW about.
I am wondering what makes you say that D300 is a "So-So" camera....:think: The D300 was an enormously popular camera when it arrived...and its appearance prompted Canon to come out with 50D less than a year after 40D which looked like a rather feeble attempt to counter its popularity.
 

Garion already queueing up for 7D :D
 

If you asked me, comparing image quality of D300, is it significantly better then 50D? Is there anything that the D300 can do which affect the image quality so much that the 50D can't? To me the answer is "not really".

You are right on that one. Great observations. :thumbsup:
 

Canon 1D mk III
sensor size = 1/1.3 of FF
magnification = 0.76x
coverage = 100%
viewfinder image size as fraction of FF = 0.58

Canon 7D
sensor size = 1/1.6 of FF
magnification = 1x
coverage = 100%
viewfinder image size as fraction of FF = 0.625

:bigeyes: The 7D has LARGER viewfinder than 1D MkIII.

Ok, Ok... No big deal... the 7D viewfinder image size is 'MERELY' the same as the Nikon D300. :bsmilie:

Only FF cameras have larger viewfinders

referring to the size of the prism! :sweat:

in any case, i stand corrected. :)
 

Last edited:
Err.... sorry to said this. Does anyone felt that the 'English' at Canon Rumors Website is kind of weird ??? :think:

Like badly translated stuff.... :sweat:
 

Garion already queueing up for 7D :D
Depends man. :think: Wait for official announcement 1st. From the rumoured specs, looks like its a bird shooter's dream come true. ;)
 

Err.... sorry to said this. Does anyone felt that the 'English' at Canon Rumors Website is kind of weird ??? :think:

Like badly translated stuff.... :sweat:
Cuz that's Google-english ;)
 

Depends man. :think: Wait for official announcement 1st. From the rumoured specs, looks like its a bird shooter's dream come true. ;)

Almost "dream" come true... Still no AF@f/8 :(
 

i'm hoping it's FF.. hehehe
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top