As I mentioned in another thread, compared to the mk I, the AI servo seems a tad snappier compared to the mark I even though it is essentially the same focusing module. (It could be due to the digic processor or the new camera algorithms.) I shot an entire sports assignment with it and had no problems at all covering it which is extremely surprising given the reputation for being a "slower" camera".So yes, the 5D mark ii can do sports even! At its price point, i really have nothing to complain about.
Here's an example, which I posted in another thread on the performance.
![]()
Yep, should be the same.Is the LCD resolution of the 5DmII the same as that of 50D?
then how, tilt for what?
1)used in architectural ---------good, beyond people's experience
1)used for life, especially people----------not so good, out of people's experience, uncomfortable.
I do not see why there should be limited applications of selective focus in making a creative connection between my subject and the environment. I have seen enough of creativity of Scheimpflug in LF users that geared my curiosity. Short of getting true LF flexibility, I do not see why the use should be limited on hard body T/S lenses.
But like the use of fisheyes or the play of thin DOF with wide aperture lenses, the output being safe/comfortable/edible or not is really to individual taste.
Meanwhile , the 5Dm2 is a great camera, absolutely no regrets in the purchase
Ryan
Oh ya.. anyone with any idea on the pricing for the battery grip of late ?? :dunno:
Thanks!![]()
Hi, can ask if the location of AF points of the 5D mk2 the same as 5D or more spread out?
Thanks..
Oh ya.. anyone with any idea on the pricing for the battery grip of late ?? :dunno:
Thanks!![]()
before CNY,CP-M was quoting a friend of mine for 399.
380 at simlim AP
I think a lot depends on how you like to work and how you value the results. If you value image quality and cinematic video quality, the 5D2 will give you more satisfaction but it involves a higher investment (in lenses too!) and hard work, moreso on the video side. That's my experience with the 5D2 so far.i'm into portraits & short video captures (usually not more than 20-30 minutes).
was therefore thinking of getting Fuji's S5Pro + Canon Camcorder HF100.
for those who now have real-time experience of the 5DII, do you think the 5DII would give me more satisfaction than S5Pro + HF100 for the purpose stated above?
S5Pro + HF100, put together, is about S$1000 cheaper, but wondering if 5DII is the better choice now & in the long run?
appreciate any advice!
Well, it depends on what you define as "pay off". There are new things to learn on the 5D2 but it's not that different from previous models. Photography wise, I wouldn't think it's that much different from using any other camera like the S5Pro but video wise it would be very different from a videocam like the HF100. Taking videos on the 5D2 is quite a bit more involving, mostly because you have to control the focus yourself. It gets easier with practice, but still hard work compared with a regular videocam.Higher investment, but if it pays off in the long run, still ok?
Could you share more on the 'hard work' bit of using 5DII? Is it because it's still new to your workflow?....As in, I often go through that 'non-enjoyable' set-up stage with new purchases :embrass:. Would it get better as you groove to it, or is it overall, more work than the original 5D?
CP offered CC 0% but silly me didn't take it up.Hi newbie here - has anyone bought 'body only' with CC 0% & which shop?