Doesn't seem typical. ISO1600 is very clean even at 100% crop. Noise starts showing up at ISO3200 or so but even 6400 is usable if you don't blow the picture up.i recently did a night shoot with ISO set at 1600. while the image looked fine on computer, the amount of noise produced on print at 1600 is really bad.
imagine my horror when i saw all the noise.
Doesn't seem typical. ISO1600 is very clean even at 100% crop. Noise starts showing up at ISO3200 or so but even 6400 is usable if you don't blow the picture up.
i recently did a night shoot with ISO set at 1600. while the image looked fine on computer, the amount of noise produced on print at 1600 is really bad.
imagine my horror when i saw all the noise.
take into consideration the print size and how far back ur viewing.
Hi sprewell,
Hope you can share up the nite shoot snapped by ISO1600 and a Quick snap of the printed
ISO1600 images.
It just for comparasion to see how bad it it.
Hope you don't mind share those info at here.
after shooting movies in Live view, and also shooting photos on the 5D, i have come to conclude that it is virtually impossibly to produce good video, and shoot professional photos at the same time.
I already mentioned that way earlier when the 5d was first released and my view has obviously not changed.
No auto focus. You have to use a tripod for everything to prevent hand shake. You get blurry subjects the moment they move. And you cant follow them accurately if the camera's on the tripod.
And during all that time where you're trying to set up your camera to take that video, you're losing valuable time meant for shooting your professional shots, which means, loads of missed shots.
The only possible feasible scenario is that you have 1 photographer and 1 video grapher, and the videographer is purely using a 5d Mark II just for video purposes, which would be retarded since the 5D is mean to be a still camera in the first place.
I rest my case.
sample picture :
![]()
see at top left area... quite obvious right...