I had read this thread from the beginning and my comments are that most employers of domestic helper are faced with an employment contract that requires them to either give their maids a rest day, or compensate them accordingly for working. However, some employers have sought ways to get around the terms or extract the most from their workers and likewise there are employers who give their maids one or two off days a month or even on special occasions like Christmas Day, sending a fellow friend at the airport, etc.
I believe most of us must have also read from a "TODAY" straw poll of 50 employers, it found that only 62 per cent gave their maids a rest day and in my opinion, there are several simple reasons why many Singaporean employers are reluctant to give their maids a day off due to the reasons below:
a) You see, if the maid runs away, the government will fine the employer $5,000. If the maid commits a crime such as shoplifting, the government will fine the employer $5,000.
b) If the maid is caught having sex with someone, the government will fine the employer $5,000. If the maid gets pregnant, the government will also fine the employer $5,000.
(Oh, and you have to send your maid for a pregnancy test every six months).
If you didn't know any of the above, then either you do not employ a maid, or you didn't read the small print of the Manpower Ministry's work permit conditions.
Many employers are afraid that if their maid has a day off and gets into trouble, the employer will not only have to solve the trouble, but also have to fork out $5,000 to the authorities. (Not that the government will then help you solve the trouble. It's just a fine, plain & simple).
Intuitively, this smacks of gross unfairness. The employer gets punished not for something he did, but for something that somebody else (the maid) did. Furthermore, once the maid leaves the employer's residence, the employer has no way of monitoring where the maid goes and what she does there.
To encourage employers to give their maids a day off, the government needs to amend these rules.
I agree that employers should be fined and punished, if they fail to perform their responsibilities as employers - for example, paying the maid's salary on time; providing adequate food, medical and accommodation; and ensuring a safe, secure working environment.
But employers should not be held responsible, for things that a maid may do, of her own free will. When the maid goes out on her rest day, the employer simply has no viable way to ensure that she will not do anything that breaches her work permit conditions. (Which, by the way, are quite extensive and onerous).
Strangely, if your maid runs away, it IS your fault and you SHOULD be punished. Even if you did not personally do anything to let her run away (apart from giving her a day off). and similarly, if your maid becomes pregnant, it IS your fault and you SHOULD be punished. Even if you did not personally do anything to make her pregnant.:angel:
Oh well. What can I say? Maids are not terrorists and the rules stacked against you even though the lapse is no far greater, and graver, implications than the recent missing person because you won't get off lightly.