even just the setting of minimum base fee?
I believe so. You can set minimum for yourself, your own company/business, etc. The moment you agree with others, that's considered collusion.
even just the setting of minimum base fee?
ok. Hopefully can have a workable solution. Sometimes I also pity the genuinely ignorant folks who requests for low prices and publish personal details online, but end up getting ridiculed.I believe so. You can set minimum for yourself, your own company/business, etc. The moment you agree with others, that's considered collusion.
Will move the discussion out of this thread when I with my desktop computer.
Fully agree on the above.to be honest guys...
It is better to educate more photog about the true cost of running a successful business of photography then trying to fight the market. It is then up to them to decide what they want to do.
No one can stop anyone who want to pay nothing and no one can stop people to take that up.
We can't save the world but helping a group of photog at a time is a good start.
regards,
Hart
so many requirements and you only paying $100 - $150
$100 - $150 per hour is the correct range!
you got your own gear, you want to save money ask your relative to shoot... save you the $100 - $150 already
just think about WHY ARE YOU HIRING A PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER IN THE FIRST PLACE
Brother I suggest there is not need to spend any money take the $100 buy another trigger so you can remotely fire the camera - that way you can do it yourself for the family part. shoot wider and crop in post. See how you can save money and tell your friends and family you number one photographer.
What you mean by professional DSLR or mirrorless? Seems like a lousy photographer will do as long as he carries a camera that looks big and scary!
You stated requirement for all the wrong reasons. You even trying to entice the responder to use your gear thinking a gear will produce good result without having the slightest thought one may need sometime to learn abt your equip. I shouldn't be telling you and let the responder fumble with it and eat into your time. You thinking by lending your gear can cut another $50?
I really feel like not commenting but can't help it. Too many cheapo trying their luck.
Ironically and unfortunately, what Ponraj Krish said wasn't wrong. Service wanted section did not dictate the minimum price for any service. So I guess we got to move on, there will always be others who love to exploit. However I choose to believe there are some good clients out there will appreciate photography and pay us according and correctly.
Haaa, what a big fat joke. Mr Ponraj Krish, expecting good post-processing skill alone is already 10x your miserable budget.
RAW files too? Add-on another 10x (your miserable budget) again.
As always, cheapos will forever be cheapos. Sames goes to cheapos/freebos cameraman (you are not fit to be called a photographer).
Want to do cheap or even provide free services? Go to your friends or relatives (which I believe will be more than happy) BUT NOT publicizing your pathetic cheap rates everywhere.
It's an insult to your camera.
I was really surprised to see my Service wanted thread was made as big discussion here, i am Ok as far as its healthy discussion. I read and followed all the guidance of 'Service Wanted " section. there is no minimum Pay per hour advised, not the law of the land too if you have problem with minimum wages/pay/fee/charge, go and deal with someone else and not with me.I am just a service requester. If someone is interested they will approach me, if you are not just move on. i got mail and message from around 22 gentlemen's (very thankful to them) and i agreed with someone who suited me based on negotiation. This is how market works.its based on supply and demand/ Will and Wish / level of service wanted and level of expectation met . here few advised me a lot on what i need to do and how to, its non of anyone business unless asked.
I sell my photos as loyalty stock photos, the royalty as low as US$0.34 per download, that is about S$0.50.I agree. It is willing buyer and willing seller, as long as both parties agree, then it is none of other people's business. Talking about being cheapo, many professional photographers are also selling their work as royalty free at as low as 20 cents a piece, so who is cheaper?
Some people jump when they see a low quote, accusing others of undercutting. If you have lots of jobs at good rates, and you can produce work that others can't, nobody can undercut you. Why do you worry? Teaching others not to be exploited? A real life lesson is more effective than words.
Just my 2 cents.