microcosm said:Just discovered that for events, the best set up turned out to be a 9-18mm with the E-M5. Really fast and will not be wrong. The zoom range give me a little play in tighter spaces.
The photos are bad. I expect a much better job if it's a wedding.iPhone Wedding Photography | Chicago Destination Lifestyle Wedding Photographer - Kenny Kim Photography
its not impossible to use OMD for a paid assigment, end of the day, the camera is just another gear... important thing is the photographer skill, knowledge and wits to improvise
The photos are bad. I expect a much better job if it's a wedding.
Actually I think proper photographers regard the dress code. I never saw a wedding photographer in T-shirt and jeans.Talking of perception vs reality, why does every wedding photographer I see go around in t-shirt and jeans ? If I were to pay for a "professional"-looking photographer, I would at least expect them to wear a proper shirt and pants, if not a tie. Especially considering that they are running around cutting in front of the couple even when the couple is walking down the aisle. Yeah, photographers are working but so are waiters, and waiters dress up for the job.
i think the best for indoor events is the pana 12-35 F2.8... but quite expensive...
do u think 25mm 1.4 will be good for indoor parties?
The photos are bad. I expect a much better job if it's a wedding.
flamenco said:Not that I am any expert. Have to agree that I would be disappointed if these were my wedding photos.
I did a product (mooncakes) shoot for a friend, using the 45mm (btn my limited skills and his budget), it was passable, wish I had the 75mm a couple of mths ago.
As7eroidS said:I like to say its not always about the gears used. Its the composition and skills/techniques that matters as well.
Imo, the iPhone pics were taken pretty good i.e the photographer. IQ aside.
I can pass my 1Dx to anyone here who might not do better in terms of composition, IQ aside. My 2 cents![]()
May not be that great if indoor w/low light imo
I quite liked it actually, though the quality could tell it was from a phone
I have seen a lot of better gear, better IQ and crap composition. So I have to agree with you, spidey89... I would have accepted these images as my wedding photos. It is about the moment captured, and not pixel peeping. Granted, the couple should have had some proper studio sessions with larger format cameras with higher imaging quality to blow up the images for wall mounting...
The photos are bad. I expect a much better job if it's a wedding.
microcosm said:I have seen a lot of better gear, better IQ and crap composition. So I have to agree with you, spidey89... I would have accepted these images as my wedding photos.
Are you serious? The compositions are horrible. My wedding photos run circles around those shots.![]()
No doubt they are good photos as in composition and capture etc, but you can see the equipment being the limiting factor in terms of the overall picture quality.