As Fullframe has tried to again spam our forums with the exact same message even after a warning was given, it is timely for us to provide some insight into what has transpired and to clear up the allegations.
SLCC's account has
NOT been deregistered as so loudly proclaimed in the thread title - the status of the account has just been downgraded to Member as can be seen here -
SLCC member profile - as we have cancelled SLCC's subscription as an Advertiser in the Workshops & Shoots section. We have offered to refund the balance of their subscription and are waiting to contact Joanne who is currently out of the country.
The statement "SLCC subscribs to many stickys and advertise for Many Photography Courses and they been paying CS lots of money over the years." is erroneous in the sense that while SLCC has subscribed to various packages over the last two years, the money collected is definitely
NOT in the "lots of money" range. In fact, if members care to take a look at the rates here -
Subscription to Workshop Rates - and multiply that by the number of advertisers there are in the Workshops section, the total collected on a monthly basis is only enough to pay a fraction of our costs.
The main reason we decided to cancel SLCC's subscription earlier was that we had come to know of activities conducted that served primarily to drive ClubSNAP members to their own forums. While we fully acknowledge that members are free to roam and participate wherever they like, we fully subscribe to our stand that we will not tolerate the actions of owners/administrators of other forums to come into ClubSNAP and actively poach our members whether by abuse of our system or by other means.
At the end of the day, it was purely a decision to cancel SLCC's subscription to the Workshop section based on what we have discovered. Just as any entity can refuse a sale/subscription or cancel a sale/subscription based on circumstances, we have done the same.
I hope that this provides more clarity to the members on our actions - the cancellation was not about the money, it was more on the behaviour and conduct that was found to be in violation of our guidelines.