D610 User Thread


Never ever go on holiday with a brand new untested camera is one of those rules I find myself breaking. Exposure looks ok, the camera tends to select for bigger appertures than I like to compensate for low light. The problem with these shots is AF-auto area mode. I would rather shoot in AF-S Area mode. But I am going to see if its any better with AF-On and AF-C. The result the focus in the photos is not where I want it to be.

Finally figured out how to post photos. These are the shots with "new camera on holiday".

Most of these are shot with Tamron 28-75F2.8 - light and inexpensive lens. I have not figured out how good or sharp this lens is.

Weight issue
For me the choice between the 70-210mmF2.8VRII and the 70-210mmF4VR was simple. Buy the lens that I can hold up with ease to take photos. I stared long and hard at the more expensive 70-210mmF2.8VRII, but at 1.530kg and the weight of the camera at 0.85kg, it would mean that I am holding up 2.38kg to my face. Just not doable if you want to walk around with this lens for me. Also I understand the bokeh reduction from F2.8-4.0 is not significant. I can live slightly less bokeh and 1 stop less. I would rather have a lens that my arms can manage and will actually use, rather have one that I only use when mounted on a tripod at home. I have to take more photos with it before I figure out if I really like it. As for all the technical stuff about how sharp and all that, I do not know. As long as it focuses fast enough, not too heavy, looks sharp in photoshop if I don't mess up the focus point - I am happy, I am not really into the technical comparison of sharpness, IQ and all that.

I think you mean 70-200. 70-210 is from the old days.

Anyway, your pictures look fine. The water lilies one look like it has a slight magenta cast, but I might be mistaken.

Tamron 28-75 is a very sharp lens. I used it for a couple of years. The only issue with that lens is sometimes the AF is not very accurate especially with AF-S. You will do better with that lens when using AF-C.
 

I think you mean 70-200. 70-210 is from the old days.
Oops! Yes you are right I meant 70-200.

Anyway, your pictures look fine. The water lilies one look like it has a slight magenta cast, but I might be mistaken.
Yes over did the magenta. Will have a look again and fix it.

Tamron 28-75 is a very sharp lens. I used it for a couple of years. The only issue with that lens is sometimes the AF is not very accurate especially with AF-S. You will do better with that lens when using AF-C.
Good to know.
 

Last edited:
oh, I tried LR5 trial, it shows package installation error. There is DNG converter update as well, convert all nef files then use it in LR.
http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/cameraraw8-3.html

Thank bro... for whatever reason.... even the DNG Converter also cannot work...... does not allow me to select any nef files... all grey off.... :dunno:
 

Seems like a few of is are suffering from the package installer error. Hope Adobe will release a quick fix. But I don't know if it's an adobe issue or osx issue. :( Sad hopefully final release won't have any issues.
 

Hope mine works, otherwise I've just wasted 800MB+ download overnight for LR5.3 :(

Edit: Yes, it worked. would have been nice if they separated the files out to 32 and 64bit as each one of those is 400MB+ and if you knew which operating system you have, then you only have to download the relevant one, instead of a file containing both versions.
 

Last edited:
It is smart, responsive and fast enough for my purposes as I do not shoot sports. The highest speed at which I have taken a photo is 1/2000 and that was just once, so I do not not mind at all that the fastest shutter speed is 1/4000.

you need the 1/8000 if you want to shoot at f1.4 during the day. For me actually the 1/4000 is the major deal breaker for the D610. I regularly hit 1/8000 at f1.4 in daytime so if I get the D610, I probably need to fiddle with ND filters which is such a pain.
 

Last edited:
you need the 1/8000 if you want to shoot at f1.4 during the day. For me actually the 1/4000 is the major deal breaker for the D610. I regularly hit 1/8000 at f1.4 in daytime so if I get the D610, I probably need to fiddle with ND filters which is such a pain.
Actually you need 1/16000 for that, 1/8000 is a deal breaker.
 

Anyone knows if the D610 is MIJ or MIC or MIT?
 

you need the 1/8000 if you want to shoot at f1.4 during the day. For me actually the 1/4000 is the major deal breaker for the D610. I regularly hit 1/8000 at f1.4 in daytime so if I get the D610, I probably need to fiddle with ND filters which is such a pain.

Actually you need 1/16000 for that, 1/8000 is a deal breaker.

:bsmilie: The sky is the limit! :sweat:
 

I wonder why 1/16000 and 1/24000 aren't common in high end bodies anymore like in the film days.

Really?? Which film cameras are those?
 

Last edited:
Back
Top