wow, not that i am buying d5 but i was hoping to buy the d810 replacement.
this is a serious step backwards, i will take higher base iso dr over better high iso performance anyday.
why did nikon go this route? do other people think differently? is there really a demand for more high iso vs base iso dr?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/9402203921/nikon-d5-shows-drop-in-dynamic-range
this is a serious step backwards, i will take higher base iso dr over better high iso performance anyday.
why did nikon go this route? do other people think differently? is there really a demand for more high iso vs base iso dr?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/9402203921/nikon-d5-shows-drop-in-dynamic-range