And those people who needed the help.....goes to who for help??
Let's not take this too far. The intention is good, and the help is provided. Of course, we would love to see more being provided. So it boils down to the organisation. Can they run the charity better and more efficiently? We should not hurt those who need the help. What they need is volunteers...
If each poster here can volunteer 3hrs each per month, they can probably reduce the number of headcount of paid staff. More importantly, if a CEO VOLUNTEERS instead of being salaried, I think we can use the extra $$$ to help more people.
Suggestion:: Since the MPs are already paid million dollars, why not have each of them take turns to run NKF for 2 year each as their second appointment?