hehe... opppsss shd be Lee Hsien Yang...redStX said:err....1st person named is the PM ley!!![]()
hehe... opppsss shd be Lee Hsien Yang...redStX said:err....1st person named is the PM ley!!![]()
yah.. totally agreed. I almost joined them as Internal Auditor... heng ah....poohbear said:I understand your pt , but i guess it's time the BOD and the regulatory authority starts to review the whole thing. TOo much money for them to play around liao ....
nemesis32 said:So what you saying is because it's a charity, you cannot pay for staffs (all must be volunteer?) or just not overpaid?
I believe NKF have some guidelines on how much they can pay (assuming their finance/audit committee and BOD is doing their job).
All i can say is how much he has paid is irrelavant. Impt is how much he has contributed and is he overpaid or paid fairly.
Del_CtrlnoAlt said:yqt... he being blantly honest lah... in short... we are all stupid...
My friend, 2.1m in cash and other benefits includes bonus share etc... It is not what he earns from shares. What it means is the cost to the company to give him the option and thus what he earns is much more than his basic salary.Hommie said:Not really, for Singtel's CEO Mr Lee is paid $2.3 million annually. He received S$2.1 million - came in the form of cash and other benefits. Mr Lee was also granted performance shares worth about S$1.8 million.
If you don't lump the shares(valuation would change according to market) and other options together, they not more than the basic of a yearly income.
YoungPAP said:We got to take a step back and look at the bigger picture. Though i do not like it that my donations intended to fund the dialysis patients are used in parts to pay the bonuses of the management, we have to accept that in this world, we got to reward performance with money. You have to judge for your self if a ggod job has been done. However it would be a great gesture if those who benefits, give back in money or in kinds or in organs to the company that gives them.
Thats where you are wrong... If i am not wrong, BOD mostly are volunteers... even if they are paid, they will be paid less than CEO as they will prob get a director fee or honorarium...XPeriment626 said:Of course they have to pay staff, but not overpay them. And please, NKF guidelines? The Board is obviously as well paid as Durai so don't expect them to make any noise about these excesses.
How much he is paid is not only relevant, it is PUBLIC INTEREST. Even CEOs and Ministers have to disclose their salaries, who is Durai that he should be given such special privacy treatment?? If the public knew that NKF could pay him $600k and send him on first class travel, they would use their hard earned money to give to OTHER charities who would use it for wheelchairs and hearing aids, etc.
You seem to advocate that the ends justify the means. They do not. And many poorer Singaporeans who still give of their hard-earned money to help the needy will not appreciate Durai's excesses when clearly NKF has more money than it can properly dispense.
That's why NKF moved into cancer fund - after the reserves issue blew up, people realised that the money they were hoarding and using for "admin expenses" was greatly disproportionate to the pool of kidney beneficiaries, so NKF has to create a new pool of supposed beneficiaries to justify the huge reserves.
XPeriment626 said:Goondoo said:A friend over the other forum did a summarisation.../QUOTE]
Don't think this comparison is accurate. Remember, the NKF financial statement shows two different items of expenditure that include salary costs. The salary of the NKF top management will definitely skew the average way off so it has probably been moved to be hidden under "Administrative Costs" (which in their financial statement they admit does include salaries). Thus the figure in the comparison above only refers to the rank-and-file salaried workers at the dialysis centres, not the folks who get to use $900 taps.
If this is true that the question will be " why do you need to hide? " and " what else are you hidding "
My friend, his BASIC IS S$2.3 million. Get it? 2.1 million is cash and other benefits.nemesis32 said:My friend, 2.1m in cash and other benefits includes bonus share etc... It is not what he earns from shares. What it means is the cost to the company to give him the option and thus what he earns is much more than his basic salary.
Imagine it's worse in US, Claria Forlani, the ousted CEO of HP is still getting something like US$49m after being sacked! that's overpayment.
XPeriment626 said:How much he is paid is not only relevant, it is PUBLIC INTEREST. Even CEOs and Ministers have to disclose their salaries, who is Durai that he should be given such special privacy treatment?? If the public knew that NKF could pay him $600k and send him on first class travel, they would use their hard earned money to give to OTHER charities who would use it for wheelchairs and hearing aids, etc.
XPeriment626 said:You seem to advocate that the ends justify the means. They do not. And many poorer Singaporeans who still give of their hard-earned money to help the needy will not appreciate Durai's excesses when clearly NKF has more money than it can properly dispense.
That's why NKF moved into cancer fund - after the reserves issue blew up, people realised that the money they were hoarding and using for "admin expenses" was greatly disproportionate to the pool of kidney beneficiaries, so NKF has to create a new pool of supposed beneficiaries to justify the huge reserves.
Ok. i misunderstood your wordings but isnt that 100% already or almost? equivalent to 10-12mths bonus right?Hommie said:My friend, his BASIC IS S$2.3 million. Get it? 2.1 million is cash and other benefits.
nemesis32 said:There is no statutory requirement to let u know how much the CEO earns or how much NKF saved each year as it's not listed. This is the same case as Temasek Holdings, there is no need for disclosure. Unless the govt acted on it, they are entitled to disclose whatever details them wanted to.
Even for listed companies, the CEO salary need not be disclosed to public, just disclosing the band, say how many execs earn 100-500k, 500k-1m, 1m and above etc. So still subject to your interpretation.
When you donate, you already know you have to pay for the staff salary, rental, advertising etc. For the tV show, they prob need to get sponsors from OSim etc.
As for the tap, i agree thats a bit extravagant.... but maybe you did not visit the building.... i can tell you the tap is nothing compared to the building and reno....
yqt said:It may not be a conscientious effort to hide lah... Accounting standards sometimes makes it difficult to see the whole pic. If you have the full financial statements, usually a full disclousre of total staff costs is required (for listed companies) but not sure if it applies for Charities... I don't think so as i audited quite a few before....XPeriment626 said:If this is true that the question will be " why do you need to hide? " and " what else are you hidding "
nemesis32 said:There is no statutory requirement to let u know how much the CEO earns or how much NKF saved each year as it's not listed. This is the same case as Temasek Holdings, there is no need for disclosure. Unless the govt acted on it, they are entitled to disclose whatever details them wanted to.
Even for listed companies, the CEO salary need not be disclosed to public, just disclosing the band, say how many execs earn 100-500k, 500k-1m, 1m and above etc. So still subject to your interpretation.
When you donate, you already know you have to pay for the staff salary, rental, advertising etc. For the tV show, they prob need to get sponsors from OSim etc.
As for the tap, i agree thats a bit extravagant.... but maybe you did not visit the building.... i can tell you the tap is nothing compared to the building and reno....
AReality said:I now jobless, just sent in a resume to NKF for a job...
I requested for only $5k per mth, 3 mths bonus, for the job of CEO. Hope u all dun undercut me pls...
nemesis32 said:Thats where you are wrong... If i am not wrong, BOD mostly are volunteers... even if they are paid, they will be paid less than CEO as they will prob get a director fee or honorarium...
nemesis32 said:There is no statutory requirement to let u know how much the CEO earns or how much NKF saved each year as it's not listed. This is the same case as Temasek Holdings, there is no need for disclosure. Unless the govt acted on it, they are entitled to disclose whatever details them wanted to.