sinned79 said:this is a good example of overcooked HDR. The skies look horrible to me.
Noted. I would like to get the most of the camera instead of doing more post process.
sinned79 said:this is a good example of overcooked HDR. The skies look horrible to me.
rvf79 said:Noted. I would like to get the most of the camera instead of doing more post process.
That's nonsense, sorry to be blunt. The in-camera processing is not detailed enough, you can only change so many settings and they will always be applied to the entire image. There is no selection of certain areas possible. Also, certain simple adjustments are completely unavailable for in-camera processing, e.g. highlighting shadows, recovering highlights etc.Noted. I would like to get the most of the camera instead of doing more post process.
any site to recommend me to see the master art?
I would like to have a subject plus the background type.
heading to BKK tmr and hope I am able to get some good composition or at least better than the normal average joe.
any site to recommend me to see the master art?
I would like to have a subject plus the background type.
heading to BKK tmr and hope I am able to get some good composition or at least better than the normal average joe.
another one at ISO 100 50mm F2.8 1/200 pocket bouncer
Please focus on one topic: portrait or landscape. Portrait orientation also has a reason to be named this way, similar to landscape - now look at your last picture. I strongly suggest you start with landscape without any person in it. Landscape has a big advantage: it stands still, it's still there tomorrow and it won't complain if you need 2h to frame the shot. Learn about the very basics.
Beside this: your last pic is OOF, the focus is at the shoulder / upper arm at the lower part of the image. In portraits, the focus should be on the eye(s) for a start. First pic: the leading line forms a slope down to the right with the girl standing at the highest point. Ready to slide down..? The eye of the viewer is drawn to the slope of the rail .. into the dark 'somewhere'.. away from the girl, to the few lights at the beach.. and then..? Also here the girl is OOF.
To be honest: it would be best for you to attend a class room session. A guided approach seems top work better for you.
i believe TS is trying to learn how to "master the art" of getting a portrait shot in with the landscape. i.e. fantastic holiday shots with the background and "model"
honestly from what i see, TS isn't paying much attention to what you guys are saying. so i guess you guys are wasting time on him.
which type of course will be good for a start?
went through the course in CS, not sure which 1 is suitable. it cost ard 300-400... sweat... is there courses below 100?
Not that he is not listening, but i think he is too eagerly jumping everywhere, landscape to special effects to portraiture when he has not even understand the basics which is the most important to achieve whatever results he wanted.
I suspect you know the saying of peanuts and monkeys..? The famous story of the master creating master pieces using crappy tools is .. well.. a story. If you want to achieve decent results you should spend a decent (not sinful) amount of efforts (time, material, money) to start. What would you expect from a 4h session costing $100 ($25 hourly rate)?which type of course will be good for a start?
went through the course in CS, not sure which 1 is suitable. it cost ard 300-400... sweat... is there courses below 100?