Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender1.4x !!


For the purpose of comparison.

From heaviest to lightest.

4.50kg - EF 800mm f/5.6L IS USM
3.92kg - EF 600mm f/4L IS II USM
3.85kg - EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM
3.62kg - EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4X
3.19kg - EF 500mm f/4L IS II USM
2.52kg - EF 200mm f/2L IS USM
2.35kg - EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM

These lenses need to go on a diet. :o
 

Build body with plastic, people complain poor build quality and feels cheap. Build with metal, people complain too heavy. Use combination of both, people complain cutting corners.
 

Last edited:
Had a chance to shoot with the 200-400mm during the recent Canon Lion City Cup. Some quick impressions:

945627_10151417944886167_723685646_n.jpg

The 200-400mm f/4L IS next to it's tiny 70-200mm f/4L IS cousin.

Overall I think it's safe to say this is Canon's sharpest zoom lens (and most expensive while at it). Pretty hand-holdable, if you're the kind that thinks a 300mm f/2.8 is hand-holdable. For football, the zoom range is very versatile. You can get action from way across half-field AND just within the penalty box. With the flick of the built-in TC, across the field goal mouth action is *just* possible.

Handling wise, the zoom ring has quite a heft to it, you'll need your entire hand on the zoom ring to move it with any speed. Unlike the more common 2-fingers under the lens to zoom technique most people use. The TC switch needs some getting used to flick without leaving your eye off the camera.


Singapore U15 vs Corinthians


Waiting to hear what the others have to say on the 200-400mm.
 

Had a chance to shoot with the 200-400mm during the recent Canon Lion City Cup. Some quick impressions:


The 200-400mm f/4L IS next to it's tiny 70-200mm f/4L IS cousin.

Overall I think it's safe to say this is Canon's sharpest zoom lens (and most expensive while at it). Pretty hand-holdable, if you're the kind that thinks a 300mm f/2.8 is hand-holdable. For football, the zoom range is very versatile. You can get action from way across half-field AND just within the penalty box. With the flick of the built-in TC, across the field goal mouth action is *just* possible.

Handling wise, the zoom ring has quite a heft to it, you'll need your entire hand on the zoom ring to move it with any speed. Unlike the more common 2-fingers under the lens to zoom technique most people use. The TC switch needs some getting used to flick without leaving your eye off the camera.


Waiting to hear what the others have to say on the 200-400mm.

Thanks for the report on the 200-400. It is quite a large lens. I didn't realize it was that BIG! :bigeyes:

The photo you provide of the football players is absolutely incredible.

I wonder how many decades I'll have to wait before I can buy a used copy on the B&S forum. :)
 

wow, look at the dust trail behind the left foot. simply amazing !

Had a chance to shoot with the 200-400mm during the recent Canon Lion City Cup. Some quick impressions:

945627_10151417944886167_723685646_n.jpg

The 200-400mm f/4L IS next to it's tiny 70-200mm f/4L IS cousin.

Overall I think it's safe to say this is Canon's sharpest zoom lens (and most expensive while at it). Pretty hand-holdable, if you're the kind that thinks a 300mm f/2.8 is hand-holdable. For football, the zoom range is very versatile. You can get action from way across half-field AND just within the penalty box. With the flick of the built-in TC, across the field goal mouth action is *just* possible.

Handling wise, the zoom ring has quite a heft to it, you'll need your entire hand on the zoom ring to move it with any speed. Unlike the more common 2-fingers under the lens to zoom technique most people use. The TC switch needs some getting used to flick without leaving your eye off the camera.


Singapore U15 vs Corinthians


Waiting to hear what the others have to say on the 200-400mm.
 




Alongside the Nikon 200-400mm f/4 VR II
 

Back
Top