yehosaphat
Senior Member
Yup... tat's why asked if monopods are useful in this case and is it worth it to get it?
I have a slik pro pod 600. At once, it quite popular also...yehosaphat said:Hi all,
Just got a quote for Manfrotto monopod:
1) 676B - $55
2) 680B - $90
Think its a good deal? What will be a suitable one for a 350D with 100mm macro lens?
ST_sg said:I have a slik pro pod 600. At once, it quite popular also...
can't comment much since I seldom bring it out to field. ;p
FYI.
http://www.thkphoto.com/products/slik/slik-13.html
EDIT: don't forget, you'll need a ballhead also...
Denosha said:Using the 1st gen Manfrotto Neotec tripod. Fantastic thing about it is you can just pull the leg out to extend them without having to use any locking levers or knobs. To retract just pull a "trigger" and push in the leg. This makes it super fast to use. The downside? It's expensive (can almost buy a CF one i think), heavy (at least the 1st gen one is) and it doesn't go down very low (which also makes it harder to carry around).
yehosaphat said:Ok.... but I checked with the guy if I actually need a ball head and he said not really necessary as long as I am fine with the fixed plane. I was thinking since it is a monopod and it is mobile, I should be able to live without the ballhead. What do you guys think?
yehosaphat said:Called up CP, they actually recommended against using Monopods for macro... might create unsharp image as compared to shooting handheld instead.... true?
hwchoy said:how can a monopod fare worst compared to handheld? :think: