Tried it on 550d body n it feels really good n sharp.
It "felt" sharp? That's probably the most honest comment in the whole thread.
Perhaps I'm overracting and maybe you did actually also test the lens properly, in which case accept my apologies. Although to be honest, if you did just feel it, then like I said, take it as a compliment that you were being honest.
If you did test it, did you compare it with anything else? Take pictures of it hand held at slow shutter speeds at high ISOs?
There's too much faff around.
But... it's an L lens of course it's sharp.
But... I have a psychic ability, I can tell how sharp a lens is merely from feeling it.
A little like Zeiss lenses inherently have a magic glow, nevermind Leica. You know inherently from the blue motif and little red dot that it will be better than anything else out there.
/swoon.
If it needs saying, the vast majority of users on this forum would never notice the difference in optical quality between that lens and a cheap 70-200. Most of those who
would notice, wouldn't necessarily suffer from having a cheap 70-200 either.
