Canew
Senior Member
It is a deal breaker for some and not a deal breaker for many. Looking at comparison of noise vis-a-vis the 40D, sure it might be less of a performer in this regard. Honestly, hard pressed to tell the difference looking at a photo in general. Of course if you scrutinize, tt's a diff story altogether.
On several other fronts, the 50D is better than the 40D. However, in my humble opinion, not a value-for-money upgrade if you had the 40D. But you know what? some people just want the latest and greatest.
The 40D vs. 50D debate has always centered on High ISO performance. We all also know that what makes a good camera is more than just ISO performance. Different people weigh different aspects of a camera differently.
Probably the model after 50D would correct this High ISO issue and then all Canon users would have less to complain about and we all will be much happier with large holes in our pockets.
(NB: I hope my post will not start another 40D vs. 50D debate again. It's getting old and pointless; and we've all heard it before.)
Noted with thanks, faineant.
