Buying the D7000. Need Advice.
- Thread starter xFamous
- Start date
luckyorange
Senior Member
I very sad to see this thread ...
I think my D7000 is the most expensive in this forum ...
how come?
NikF601
Senior Member
Kit len = 18-55mm ??
Deregistered
NikF601
Senior Member
I see , reasonable Price
Deregistered
Bro,
The kit lens is good enough to use as a starter like myself ...
But i just bought a 35mm f1.4G ... so far been loving it.
It is a very sharp and very quick lens. Not very expensive ...
ZerocoolAstra
Senior Member
technoglitz87
New Member
Deregistered
Oh Ya!!!
Sorry ! Sorry !!
I type wrongly !
I bought it at about $330 ...
Must be the ordinary type.
It's already very good to use for my level ...
twisted illusion
Senior Member
i tot i read some where in this forum that a study was conducted and realise that at electronic or it fair.. ppl actually get good deals.. by selling all the extras, the items u need left cost less than street price... i think i read it here in clubsnap...
ZerocoolAstra
Senior Member
$330, then I assume you bought the AF-S Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 DX
It's not the 'ordinary type', just that it doesn't have the fancier Nano coating and the faster max aperture of f/1.4 and is also only covering the DX image circle
ZerocoolAstra
Senior Member
maybe on some rare occasions, but I think generally it is still a better deal at the usual camera shops. Some even give away more freebies during the electronics shows, whilst still charging street prices.
twisted illusion
Senior Member
wow.. a good 70 dollars cheaper compared to the time i bought in early april, 2011... same package..
Deregistered
I got kinda mix up ...
Sorry.
Bro, the lens i got is it a lousy type?
I bought it because it is affortable for me ...
luckyorange
Senior Member
eh! bro 35mm 1.8g is not a lousy lens lei its affordable and cheap! dont think so much. i got 1 also im loving it
fmeeran
New Member
It is certainly not lousy. The 35 f/1.8 and the 50 f/1.8 are easily the best value for money when it comes to IQ for the price.
In the hands of noobs like me there is absolutely no difference between the IQ of the f/1.4 and f/1.8 lens once they are stepped down below ~f/2.2.
Last edited:
ZerocoolAstra
Senior Member
No la... it's not a lousy lens at all. If you find it lousy, you can always give it to me! ;p
I would say it's like comparing a BMW 5 series with a Maybach (if you know cars). Just because the 5-series is much cheaper, doesn't mean it's lousy
The 35/1.8 is a DX lens, which is designed primarily for cameras with APS-C sensors. Of the current Nikon range, that is the D3100, D5000, D90 (just discontinued, I heard), D7000, D300s.
Deregistered
No la... it's not a lousy lens at all. If you find it lousy, you can always give it to me! ;p
I would say it's like comparing a BMW 5 series with a Maybach (if you know cars). Just because the 5-series is much cheaper, doesn't mean it's lousy
The 35/1.8 is a DX lens, which is designed primarily for cameras with APS-C sensors. Of the current Nikon range, that is the D3100, D5000, D90 (just discontinued, I heard), D7000, D300s.
APSC ??? what's that?
Then FX lens is more expensive?
I blurr about DX and FX ... those terms ...
Similar threads
