kwttan
New Member
You should've gone with your friend since he trusts your judgement to let your evaluate his purchase. But since you didn't go, you're hurling too much abuse on someone you haven't even met or spoken to. Were you listening in on the phone too during your friend's phonecall?
Anyway, here's the guidelines, which I doubt you even know where to find it from - so I'd better provide the link. http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=248961
Since you say the condition should be 'more like 8', let's see what that a speck of dust says about the lens.
======================================
Condition: Mint
Description: Like new. Not used since it left the shop. No signs of use.
Also known as: Mint
Condition: 10
Description: Very carefully used. Only very light user marks. Without close inspection, item would pass for mint.
Also known as: Mint(-), Near-Mint, A
Condition: 9
Description: A few light user marks. Used very little and carefully. May show some very mild wear, such as rub marks by lug straps, or bright marks on metal base plate.
Also known as: Excellent(++), A/B
Condition: 8
Description: Light to moderate user marks. Typical amateur use. May have some very slight brassing, or light scratches in metal. Obviously well-maintained and cared for.
Also known as: Excellent(+), B
=====================================
mizunoblackox, I think it's more like your friend's been duped by you to think that he got a bad deal - and instigated by you, he made a phonecall to canon5d79 to request to return the lens and now, in a similarly manipulative manner, you are hoping the CS community will back your ill-conceived idea of a sale-gone-sour and then turn to your friend and say 'you see? you were cheated.'. In reality, imo, you made the deal go sour. I hope your friend reads the comments here and I hope he will ignore your opinions about HIS lens purchase and enjoy shooting with it.
:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup: