Broadcast Video Post Services

[DXNMedia]

Am supporting fellow videographers, editors and production houses for professional broadcast post production work.

When is the last time your client(s) hand you their work in Digital Betacam / Betacam format and you realised that you need to incur high costs just to transfer the footage to your working format?


I provide AFFORDABLE Digital Betacam, Betacam SP, Betacam SX, MPEG IMX, DVCAM, HDV & miniDV transfers, cloning & mobile on-site video post services.

- Tape to Tape transfers & cloning services
- Digitising services
- DVD Authoring & video looping services
- SD to HD upconvert
- HD to SD downconvert


For more details, pls go to this link:

http://www.dxnmedia.net/DXNMediaPOST.pdf

 

[DXNMedia]

Let me clarify this post.

Supported playback formats in PAL or NTSC:
- Digital Betacam
- Betacam SP
- Betacam SX
- MPEG IMX
- miniDV
- DVCAM
- HDV

Supported recording formats in PAL or NTSC:
- miniDV
- DVCAM
- HDV

:thumbsup:

 

[samvision]

Let me clarify this post.

Supported playback formats in PAL or NTSC:
- Digital Betacam
- Betacam SP
- Betacam SX
- MPEG IMX
- miniDV
- DVCAM
- HDV

Supported recording formats in PAL or NTSC:
- miniDV
- DVCAM
- HDV

:thumbsup:

upz. if you need any technical issue regarding conversion
this is the person that you should look for.
regarding to conversion and broadcast issue.

Dixon should set up some courses for the guys on this forum.

 

[DXNMedia]

Thanks Sam.

If you need more tech info, all video processing are done at uncompressed 10bit 4:2:2 for SD resolution and 10bit 4:2:2 ProRes for HD resolution.

So you can be assured that everything from ingest, capturing, editing, color grading, signal processing, HD-SD down-convert or SD-HD up-convert are maintained at the optimal quality for broadcast, film or HD delivery.

The extra benefit is that I can ingest HDV footage for your edits in a non-MPEG based environment so that you don't suffer from the pains of editing in native MPEG long-GOP system where you lose significant resolution by introducing more compression artifacts and details due to re-compression.

:thumbsup:

 

[samvision]

The extra benefit is that I can ingest HDV footage for your edits in a non-MPEG based environment so that you don't suffer from the pains of editing in native MPEG long-GOP system where you lose significant resolution by introducing more compression artifacts and details due to re-compression.

interesting..possible to share more on the this thread. coz i think there is a HDV user here, but most of the videographer are recording hdv on tape but editing in sd. Some call it future proof but i think its a waste. whats your stand ?

 

[DXNMedia]

I have no stand against the workflow coz it's all up to the delivery requirements.

The only issue to take note of is that when shooting in HDV and downconverting to SD, you need to letterbox, squeeze or crop due to HD being 16:9. So in the end, you're not maximising the full resolution of SDTV in 720x576 anyway.

Personally, if delivery requirement is in SD, I would shoot in SD mainly because HDV recordings are MPEG2 based, meaning that the image quality looses out in fast moving images, and if there's an unfortunate tape dropout, you loose more than 1 frame of video.

:thumbsup: